Moving Outdated TCP Extensions and TCP-related Documents to Historic and Informational Status
draft-ietf-tcpm-undeployed-01

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (tcpm WG)
Last updated 2015-06-06 (latest revision 2014-12-03)
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Reviews
Additional URLs
- Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state WG Document
Document shepherd No shepherd assigned
IESG IESG state Expired
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-undeployed-01.txt

Abstract

This document reclassifies several TCP extensions and TCP-related documents that have either been superseded, never seen widespread use, or are no longer recommended for use to Historic status. The affected RFCs are RFC 675, RFC 721, RFC 761, RFC 813, RFC 816, RFC 879, RFC 896, RFC 1078, and RFC 6013. Additionally, it reclassifies RFC 700, RFC 794, RFC 814, RFC 817, RFC 872, RFC 889, RFC 964, and RFC 1071 to Informational status.

Authors

Alexander Zimmermann (alexander.zimmermann@netapp.com)
Wesley Eddy (wes@mti-systems.com)
Lars Eggert (lars@netapp.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)