More Accurate ECN Feedback in TCP
draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-07

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (tcpm WG)
Authors Bob Briscoe  , Mirja Kühlewind  , Richard Scheffenegger 
Last updated 2019-01-03 (latest revision 2018-07-02)
Replaces draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-accurate-ecn
Stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Reviews
Additional Resources
- Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state WG Document (wg milestone: Dec 2021 - Submit specification... )
Document shepherd No shepherd assigned
IESG IESG state Expired
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD Spencer Dawkins
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-07.txt

Abstract

Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) is a mechanism where network nodes can mark IP packets instead of dropping them to indicate incipient congestion to the end-points. Receivers with an ECN- capable transport protocol feed back this information to the sender. ECN is specified for TCP in such a way that only one feedback signal can be transmitted per Round-Trip Time (RTT). Recently, new TCP mechanisms like Congestion Exposure (ConEx), Data Center TCP (DCTCP) or Low Latency Low Loss Scalable Throughput (L4S) need more accurate ECN feedback information whenever more than one marking is received in one RTT. This document specifies an experimental scheme to provide more than one feedback signal per RTT in the TCP header. Given TCP header space is scarce, it allocates a reserved header bit, that was previously used for the ECN-Nonce which has now been declared historic. It also overloads the two existing ECN flags in the TCP header. Supplementary feedback information can optionally be provided in a new TCP option, which is never used on the TCP SYN.

Authors

Bob Briscoe (ietf@bobbriscoe.net)
Mirja Kühlewind (mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch)
Richard Scheffenegger (rscheff@gmx.at)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)