Ballot for draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
[nits] S3 * Reference to 8224 section 8 might consider pointing all the way to 8.3 (vis. RFC 8225 section 5.2.1.1), perhaps? S4.1 * s/possess a credential/possesses a credential/ (I think) S4.2 * Perhaps start a new paragraph at "A verification service parses..."? * Does "blind transfer" have a reference to describe it? It probably doesn't need one for the intended audience...I was just curious.
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS and COMMENT items.
Thanks to Linda Dunbar for the OpsDir review.
Please respond to the Gen-ART review.
Thanks for a well-written document, Jon.
Thank you for addressing my Discuss (and Comment) points!
Though dense, this was readable by someone with no background in the subject. Only one nit: in section 3, s/identifier/identifier.