Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) Extension for Diverted Calls
draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert-09

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

Murray Kucherawy Yes

(Deborah Brungard) No Objection

(Alissa Cooper) No Objection

Comment (2020-04-06 for -08)
Please respond to the Gen-ART review.

Roman Danyliw (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2020-07-23)
No email
send info
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS and COMMENT items.

Martin Duke No Objection

Comment (2020-04-01 for -08)
Though dense, this was readable by someone with no background in the subject.

Only one nit: in section 3, s/identifier/identifier.

Benjamin Kaduk (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2020-07-17)
No email
send info
Thank you for addressing my Discuss (and Comment) points!

Erik Kline No Objection

Comment (2020-04-03 for -08)
No email
send info
[nits]

S3

* Reference to 8224 section 8 might consider pointing all the way to 8.3 (vis.
  RFC 8225 section 5.2.1.1), perhaps?

S4.1

* s/possess a credential/possesses a credential/ (I think)

S4.2

* Perhaps start a new paragraph at "A verification service parses..."?

* Does "blind transfer" have a reference to describe it?  It probably doesn't
  need one for the intended audience...I was just curious.

Warren Kumari No Objection

Comment (2020-04-07 for -08)
No email
send info
Thanks to Linda Dunbar for the OpsDir review.

(Barry Leiba) No Objection

Comment (2020-04-06 for -08)
Thanks for a well-written document, Jon.

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Martin Vigoureux No Objection

Éric Vyncke No Objection

(Magnus Westerlund) No Objection

Robert Wilton No Objection