Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

(Terry Manderson) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

Thanks for addressing my comments!

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

I agree with that the title is still not that 
descriptive of the actual content. (It seems to
promise more:-)

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com performed the opsdir review.

(Suresh Krishnan) No Objection

(Mirja Kühlewind) No Objection

Maybe be slightly more specific in the abstract, e.g.:

OLD
... this memo
   specifies a DHCPv6 option whereby a single CPE can interwork with all
   of the standardized and proposed approaches to providing encapsulated
   IPv4 in IPv6 services.

NEW
... this memo
   specifies a DHCPv6 option whereby a single CPE can interwork with all
   of the standardized and proposed approaches to providing encapsulated
   IPv4 in IPv6 services by providing a prioritization mechanism.

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection