Skip to main content

Gateway-Initiated Dual-Stack Lite Deployment
draft-ietf-softwire-gateway-init-ds-lite-08

Yes

(Ralph Droms)

No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

Ralph Droms Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-04-08 for -06) Unknown
I have no objection to the publication of this document, but I note that
the Security Considerations section is flimsy. Surely there are security
issues with how the mapping table at the AFTR is built. Although that is
a "local matter" inplementers and deployers need to be aware that this
feature must be secured.
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-04-11 for -06) Unknown
I second Stephen's DISCUSS and Pete's comment.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-04-04 for -06) Unknown
Section 6 lists a set of abbreviations to describe the type of IPv4 addresses being used in a deployment.  I understand all the possibilities, except for "nm" (described as non-meaningful/dummy).  This that just a diplomatic way of describing a network deployment that is squatting on someone's public IPv4 address space?
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06) Unknown

                            
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-04-07 for -06) Unknown
There is only one use of 2119 language, and I'm not convinced it's necessary:

   o  The softwire between the Gateway and the AFTR MAY be created at
      system startup time OR dynamically established on-demand.

Is this a protocol option that one or both sides needs to be aware of? That is, does the Gateway or the AFTR need to prepare itself for on-demand establishment, or to be prepared that on-demand might not be available? I suspect you can change it to "may" or "can" and delete the reference to 2119.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06) Unknown

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06) Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-04-12 for -06) Unknown
I support Stephen's discuss.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2012-05-01) Unknown

                            
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06) Unknown

                            
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-04-11 for -06) Unknown
Support Stephen's DISCUSS