%% You should probably cite rfc7415 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-02,
    number =    {draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control/02/},
    author =    {Eric Noel and Philip M Williams},
    title =     {{Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Rate Control}},
    pagetotal = 15,
    year =      2012,
    month =     jun,
    day =       1,
    abstract =  {The prevalent use of Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) {[}RFC3261{]} in Next Generation Networks necessitates that SIP networks provide adequate control mechanisms to maintain transaction throughput by preventing congestion collapse during traffic overloads. Already {[}draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-08{]} proposes a loss-based solution to remedy known vulnerabilities of the {[}RFC3261{]} SIP 503 (service unavailable) overload control mechanism. This document proposes a rate-based control solution to complement the loss-based control defined in {[}draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-08{]}.},
}