%% You should probably cite rfc7415 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-01, number = {draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-01}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control/01/}, author = {Eric Noel and Philip M. Williams}, title = {{Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Rate Control}}, pagetotal = 12, year = 2012, month = mar, day = 8, abstract = {The prevalent use of Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) {[}RFC3261{]} in Next Generation Networks necessitates that SIP networks provide adequate control mechanisms to maintain transaction throughput by preventing congestion collapse during traffic overloads. Already {[}draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-07{]} proposes a loss-based solution to remedy known vulnerabilities of the {[}RFC3261{]} SIP 503 (service unavailable) overload control mechanism. This document proposes a rate-based control solution to complement the loss-based control defined in {[}draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-07{]}.}, }