Use of the RSASSA-PSS Signature Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
draft-ietf-smime-pss-03
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2004-04-12
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-04-12
|
03 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2004-04-12
|
03 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2004-04-12
|
03 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2004-04-11
|
03 | Russ Housley | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup by Russ Housley |
|
2004-02-06
|
03 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-02-05 |
|
2004-02-05
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-02-05
|
03 | Ned Freed | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ned Freed by Ned Freed |
|
2004-02-05
|
03 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin |
|
2004-02-05
|
03 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten |
|
2004-02-05
|
03 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin |
|
2004-02-05
|
03 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot comment] Do we know where the two OIDs listed (in sect 2) have been assigned? Would it be good to add a ptr to … [Ballot comment] Do we know where the two OIDs listed (in sect 2) have been assigned? Would it be good to add a ptr to that? |
|
2004-02-05
|
03 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
|
2004-02-05
|
03 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
|
2004-02-04
|
03 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
|
2004-02-04
|
03 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
|
2004-02-04
|
03 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot comment] I didn't see any note about the fact that having 2 signature algorithms creates noninteroperability, which in turn is not good for security … [Ballot comment] I didn't see any note about the fact that having 2 signature algorithms creates noninteroperability, which in turn is not good for security in deployment. But that may be "too obvious to mention". |
|
2004-02-04
|
03 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand |
|
2004-02-04
|
03 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jon Peterson has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Jon Peterson |
|
2004-02-04
|
03 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot comment] I found the use of attribute names like 'signature' in this document somewhat confusing because they are unquoted. For example, in Section 3, … [Ballot comment] I found the use of attribute names like 'signature' in this document somewhat confusing because they are unquoted. For example, in Section 3, the following paragraph (in its entirety) appears: signature contains the single value resulting from the signing operation. I assumed this was a typo of the trailing fragment of a sentence, until I understood that this was referring to a 'signature' attribute in CMS SignedData, and hence it was uncapitalized. I'd like to suggest that such terms be quoted in the document. There's also several places (3 in Section 4)where line wrap or some other editorial process has put line feeds in the middle of paragraphs. |
|
2004-02-04
|
03 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
|
2004-02-03
|
03 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Ted Hardie |
|
2004-02-03
|
03 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot comment] Nit: --->The generation of RSA private key relies on random numbers Shouldn't this be "an RSA private key" or "RSA private keys"? |
|
2004-02-03
|
03 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
|
2004-02-03
|
03 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin |
|
2004-01-20
|
03 | Russ Housley | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-02-05 by Russ Housley |
|
2004-01-20
|
03 | Russ Housley | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Russ Housley |
|
2004-01-20
|
03 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Russ Housley |
|
2004-01-20
|
03 | Russ Housley | Ballot has been issued by Russ Housley |
|
2004-01-20
|
03 | Russ Housley | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2004-01-19
|
03 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
|
2004-01-05
|
03 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
|
2004-01-05
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-01-05
|
03 | Russ Housley | Last Call was requested by Russ Housley |
|
2004-01-05
|
03 | Russ Housley | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Russ Housley |
|
2004-01-05
|
03 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2004-01-05
|
03 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2004-01-05
|
03 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2004-01-05
|
03 | Russ Housley | Draft Added by Russ Housley |
|
2003-12-19
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-pss-03.txt |
|
2003-12-02
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-pss-02.txt |
|
2003-04-30
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-pss-01.txt |
|
2003-02-25
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-pss-00.txt |