Skip to main content

Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Torture Test Messages for Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)
draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests-04

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2007-11-26
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2007-11-19
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2007-11-19
04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2007-11-19
04 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2007-11-19
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2007-11-19
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2007-11-16
04 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2007-11-15
2007-11-15
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2007-11-15
04 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lisa Dusseault has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Lisa Dusseault
2007-11-15
04 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lisa Dusseault has been changed to Undefined from Yes by Lisa Dusseault
2007-11-15
04 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2007-11-15
04 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2007-11-15
04 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2007-11-15
04 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2007-11-15
04 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2007-11-15
04 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2007-11-14
04 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2007-11-14
04 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Ward
2007-11-14
04 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2007-11-13
04 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2007-11-12
04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2007-11-12
04 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2007-11-08
04 Jon Peterson Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-11-15 by Jon Peterson
2007-11-08
04 Jon Peterson State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Jon Peterson
2007-11-08
04 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jon Peterson
2007-11-08
04 Jon Peterson Ballot has been issued by Jon Peterson
2007-11-08
04 Jon Peterson Created "Approve" ballot
2007-10-12
04 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2007-10-12
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests-04.txt
2007-10-04
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Radia Perlman.
2007-09-29
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Radia Perlman
2007-09-29
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Radia Perlman
2007-09-28
04 Amanda Baber IANA Last Call comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand
this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2007-09-28
04 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2007-09-28
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2007-09-27
04 Jon Peterson Last Call was requested by Jon Peterson
2007-09-27
04 Jon Peterson State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Jon Peterson
2007-09-27
04 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2007-09-27
04 (System) Last call text was added
2007-09-27
04 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2007-09-13
04 Jon Peterson State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Jon Peterson
2007-05-17
04 Dinara Suleymanova
PROTO Write-up

(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
document and, in particular, …
PROTO Write-up

(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
document and, in particular, does he or she believe this
version is ready for forwarding to the IESG for publication?

Gonzalo Camarillo, who has reviewed this version of the document and
believes it is ready for publication.

(1.b) Has the document had adequate review both from key WG members
and from key non-WG members? Does the Document Shepherd have
any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that
have been performed?

Yes, the document has been adequately reviewed.

(1.c) Does the Document Shepherd have concerns that the document
needs more review from a particular or broader perspective,
e.g., security, operational complexity, someone familiar with
AAA, internationalization, or XML?

No.

(1.d) Does the Document Shepherd have any specific concerns or
issues with this document that the Responsible Area Director
and/or the IESG should be aware of? For example, perhaps he
or she is uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or
has concerns whether there really is a need for it. In any
event, if the WG has discussed those issues and has indicated
that it still wishes to advance the document, detail those
concerns here. Has an IPR disclosure related to this document
been filed? If so, please include a reference to the
disclosure and summarize the WG discussion and conclusion on
this issue.

No.

(1.e) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it
represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with
others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and
agree with it?

The whole WG believes this is useful work and is behind this document.

(1.f) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme
discontent? If so, please summarize the areas of conflict in
separate email messages to the Responsible Area Director. (It
should be in a separate email because this questionnaire is
entered into the ID Tracker.)

No.

(1.g) Has the Document Shepherd personally verified that the
document satisfies all ID nits? (See
http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html and
http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/.) Boilerplate checks are
not enough; this check needs to be thorough. Has the document
met all formal review criteria it needs to, such as the MIB
Doctor, media type, and URI type reviews? If the document
does not already indicate its intended status at the top of
the first page, please indicate the intended status here.

Yes.

(1.h) Has the document split its references into normative and
informative? Are there normative references to documents that
are not ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear
state? If such normative references exist, what is the
strategy for their completion? Are there normative references
that are downward references, as described in [RFC3967]? If
so, list these downward references to support the Area
Director in the Last Call procedure for them [RFC3967].

All normative references are RFCs.

(1.i) Has the Document Shepherd verified that the document's IANA
Considerations section exists and is consistent with the body
of the document? If the document specifies protocol
extensions, are reservations requested in appropriate IANA
registries? Are the IANA registries clearly identified? If
the document creates a new registry, does it define the
proposed initial contents of the registry and an allocation
procedure for future registrations? Does it suggest a
reasonable name for the new registry? See [RFC2434]. If the
document describes an Expert Review process, has the Document
Shepherd conferred with the Responsible Area Director so that
the IESG can appoint the needed Expert during IESG Evaluation?

Yes.

(1.j) Has the Document Shepherd verified that sections of the
document that are written in a formal language, such as XML
code, BNF rules, MIB definitions, etc., validate correctly in
an automated checker?

No formal language is used in the document.

(1.k) The IESG approval announcement includes a Document
Announcement Write-Up. Please provide such a Document
Announcement Write-Up. Recent examples can be found in the
"Action" announcements for approved documents. The approval
announcement contains the following sections:

Technical Summary
Relevant content can frequently be found in the abstract
and/or introduction of the document. If not, this may be
an indication that there are deficiencies in the abstract
or introduction.

This informational document provides examples of Session Initiation
Protocol (SIP) test messages designed to exercise and "torture" the
code of a SIP implementation that parses IPv6 addresses.

Working Group Summary
Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting?
For example, was there controversy about particular points
or were there decisions where the consensus was
particularly rough?

The whole SIPPING WG was behind this document.

Document Quality
Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a
significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
implement the specification? Are there any reviewers that
merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
conclusion that the document had no substantive issues? If
there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
what was its course (briefly)? In the case of a Media Type
Review, on what date was the request posted?

A.B. Nataraju and A.C. Mahendran performed dedicated reviews during this
document's WGLC. There already are SIP implementations that handle IPv6.

Personnel
Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Who is the
Responsible Area Director? If the document requires IANA
experts(s), insert 'The IANA Expert(s) for the registries
in this document are .'

Gonzalo Camarillo is the document shepherd for this document and Jon
Peterson is the responsible Area Director.
2007-05-17
04 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested
2007-05-09
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests-03.txt
2007-04-23
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests-02.txt
2007-03-08
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests-01.txt
2006-11-29
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests-00.txt