Sieve Notification Mechanism: mailto
draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-10
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-22
|
10 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Cullen Jennings |
2012-08-22
|
10 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert |
2009-01-05
|
10 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor |
2008-12-24
|
10 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress |
2008-12-24
|
10 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors |
2008-12-24
|
10 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2008-12-16
|
10 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2008-12-15
|
10 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan |
2008-12-15
|
10 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2008-12-15
|
10 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2008-12-15
|
10 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2008-12-11
|
10 | Lisa Dusseault | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Lisa Dusseault |
2008-12-06
|
10 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Cullen Jennings |
2008-12-05
|
10 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2008-12-04 |
2008-12-04
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2008-12-04
|
10 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica |
2008-12-04
|
10 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-10.txt |
2008-12-04
|
10 | Magnus Westerlund | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund |
2008-12-04
|
10 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson |
2008-12-03
|
10 | Ross Callon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon |
2008-12-03
|
10 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley |
2008-12-03
|
10 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot comment] The current IESG Write-up is replicating the whole PROTO shepherd write-up. |
2008-12-03
|
10 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu |
2008-12-02
|
10 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
2008-12-02
|
10 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk |
2008-12-02
|
10 | Tim Polk | [Ballot comment] The message composition guidelines in section 2.7 are very weak. As far as I can tell, the only field that is required to … [Ballot comment] The message composition guidelines in section 2.7 are very weak. As far as I can tell, the only field that is required to be included is the "Auto-Submitted: auto-notified" header field. Everything else is a SHOULD. Is that really the wg's intention? |
2008-12-02
|
10 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
2008-12-02
|
10 | David Ward | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Ward |
2008-12-02
|
10 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot comment] idnits complains about two instances of "MAY NOT", which isn't a valid RFC2119 term. I believe both can be replaced by MUST NOT. |
2008-12-02
|
10 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert |
2008-12-01
|
10 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot comment] Couple of nits about references (could be fixed with an RFC Editor note): [IANA] should be normative, and should point to RFC 5226 … |
2008-12-01
|
10 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen |
2008-12-01
|
10 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot discuss] It seems like the draft should include a way for a recipricant of these notifies to tell the server to stop sending them. … [Ballot discuss] It seems like the draft should include a way for a recipricant of these notifies to tell the server to stop sending them. If someone accidentally fat fingers a phone number for a SMS notify in a sieve script, how will the poor users getting all the SMS ever stop them? |
2008-12-01
|
10 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings |
2008-12-01
|
10 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot discuss] OK, this is probably a competitor in the race for the most pedantic discuss ever, but idnits does complain about two instances of … [Ballot discuss] OK, this is probably a competitor in the race for the most pedantic discuss ever, but idnits does complain about two instances of "MAY NOT", which isn't a valid RFC2119 term. I believe both can be replaced by MUST NOT. (If Lisa sticks this change into an RFC Editor Note, I promise to clear before Thursday.) |
2008-12-01
|
10 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert |
2008-11-19
|
10 | Lisa Dusseault | [Note]: 'Barry Leiba to be the expert reviewer for the registry this creates.' added by Lisa Dusseault |
2008-11-17
|
10 | Chris Newman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Chris Newman |
2008-11-17
|
10 | Chris Newman | [Ballot comment] Two fixes I believe would improve this document: 1. It "Updates: RFC 3834" because it changes the extension rules from IETF … [Ballot comment] Two fixes I believe would improve this document: 1. It "Updates: RFC 3834" because it changes the extension rules from IETF consensus to Specification Required. 2. The term "URI Header" is not defined anywhere. I assume it means "Header field name and value extracted from the mailto URI," but it might be a good idea to include that (or a similar) definition in this specification. Lisa: Who are you recommending as the expert reviewer for the new auto-submitted extension registry this creates? |
2008-11-04
|
10 | Lisa Dusseault | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2008-12-04 by Lisa Dusseault |
2008-11-04
|
10 | Lisa Dusseault | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::External Party by Lisa Dusseault |
2008-11-04
|
10 | Lisa Dusseault | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Lisa Dusseault |
2008-11-04
|
10 | Lisa Dusseault | Ballot has been issued by Lisa Dusseault |
2008-11-04
|
10 | Lisa Dusseault | Created "Approve" ballot |
2008-10-01
|
09 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-09.txt |
2008-07-09
|
08 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-08.txt |
2008-04-09
|
10 | Lisa Dusseault | State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::External Party from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Lisa Dusseault |
2008-04-09
|
10 | Lisa Dusseault | Authors probably need to respond to IANA questions... |
2008-03-31
|
10 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
2008-03-26
|
10 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Hannes Tschofenig. |
2008-03-21
|
10 | Amanda Baber | IANA Last Call comments: IANA has questions: Please define the registration procedures for the new registry created in section 6.2. Action 1 (section 6.1): Upon … IANA Last Call comments: IANA has questions: Please define the registration procedures for the new registry created in section 6.2. Action 1 (section 6.1): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will make the following assignments in the "Sieve Notification Mechanisms" registry located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/sieve-notification Mechanism name: mailto Mechanism URI: RFC2368 Mechanism-specific tags: none Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number: [RFC- ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-06.txt] Person and email address to contact for further information: Michael Haardt Action 2 (sections 6.2, 6.3): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will create the following registry "Auto-Submitted Header Keywords" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/TBD Registration Template: To: iana@iana.org Subject: Registration of new auto-submitted header field keyword Keyword value: [the text value of the field] Description: [a brief explanation of the purpose of this value] Parameters: [list any keyword-specific parameters, specify their meanings, specify whether they are required or optional; use "none" if there are none] Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number: [identifies the specification that defines the value being registered] Contact: [name and email address to contact for further information] Registration Procedures: UNKNOWN Initial contents of this registry will be: Keyword value: no Description: Indicates that a message was NOT automatically generated, but was created by a human. It is the equivalent to the absence of an Auto-Submitted header altogether. Parameters: none Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number: RFC3834 Contact: Keith Moore Keyword value: auto-generated Description: Indicates that a message was generated by an automatic process, and is not a direct response to another message. Parameters: none Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number: RFC3834 Contact: Keith Moore Keyword value: auto-replied Description: Indicates that a message was automatically generated as a direct response to another message. Parameters: none Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number: RFC3834 Contact: Keith Moore Keyword value: sieve-notify Description: Indicates that a message was generated by a Sieve notification system. Parameters: owner-email, owner-token. Both optional, both refer to the owner of the Sieve script that generated this message. See the relevant RFC for details. Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number: [RFC-sieve-notify-mailto-07] Contact: Michael Haardt We understand the above to be the only IANA Actions for this document. |
2008-03-20
|
10 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Hannes Tschofenig |
2008-03-20
|
10 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Hannes Tschofenig |
2008-03-18
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-07.txt |
2008-03-17
|
10 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2008-03-17
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2008-03-17
|
10 | Lisa Dusseault | Last Call was requested by Lisa Dusseault |
2008-03-17
|
10 | Lisa Dusseault | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Lisa Dusseault |
2008-03-17
|
10 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2008-03-17
|
10 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2008-03-17
|
10 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2008-02-25
|
10 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2008-02-25
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-06.txt |
2007-11-08
|
10 | Lisa Dusseault | State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Publication Requested by Lisa Dusseault |
2007-10-16
|
10 | Lisa Dusseault | Draft Added by Lisa Dusseault in state Publication Requested |
2007-10-05
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-05.txt |
2007-07-12
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-04.txt |
2007-07-08
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-03.txt |
2007-03-08
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-02.txt |
2006-10-18
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-01.txt |
2005-12-13
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-00.txt |