Skip to main content

Sieve Notification Mechanism: mailto
draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-10

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Cullen Jennings
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2009-01-05
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2008-12-24
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2008-12-24
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2008-12-24
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2008-12-16
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2008-12-15
10 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2008-12-15
10 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2008-12-15
10 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2008-12-15
10 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2008-12-11
10 Lisa Dusseault State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Lisa Dusseault
2008-12-06
10 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Cullen Jennings
2008-12-05
10 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2008-12-04
2008-12-04
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2008-12-04
10 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2008-12-04
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-10.txt
2008-12-04
10 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2008-12-04
10 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson
2008-12-03
10 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2008-12-03
10 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley
2008-12-03
10 Dan Romascanu [Ballot comment]
The current IESG Write-up is replicating the whole PROTO shepherd write-up.
2008-12-03
10 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2008-12-02
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2008-12-02
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2008-12-02
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
The message composition guidelines in section 2.7 are very weak.  As far as I can tell, the only field that is required to …
[Ballot comment]
The message composition guidelines in section 2.7 are very weak.  As far as I can tell, the only field that is required to be included is the "Auto-Submitted: auto-notified" header field.  Everything else is a SHOULD.  Is that really the wg's intention?
2008-12-02
10 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2008-12-02
10 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Ward
2008-12-02
10 Lars Eggert [Ballot comment]
idnits complains about two instances of "MAY NOT", which isn't a valid RFC2119 term. I believe both can be replaced by MUST NOT.
2008-12-02
10 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert
2008-12-01
10 Pasi Eronen
[Ballot comment]
Couple of nits about references (could be fixed with an RFC Editor
note): [IANA] should be normative, and should point to RFC 5226 …
[Ballot comment]
Couple of nits about references (could be fixed with an RFC Editor
note): [IANA] should be normative, and should point to RFC 5226.
[RFC2821] and [RFC2822] have been obsoleted by 5321 and 5322.
2008-12-01
10 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2008-12-01
10 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
It seems like the draft should include a way for a recipricant of these notifies to tell the server to stop sending them. …
[Ballot discuss]
It seems like the draft should include a way for a recipricant of these notifies to tell the server to stop sending them. If someone accidentally fat fingers a phone number for a SMS notify in a sieve script, how will the poor users getting all the SMS ever stop them?
2008-12-01
10 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2008-12-01
10 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
OK, this is probably a competitor in the race for the most pedantic discuss ever, but idnits does complain about two instances of …
[Ballot discuss]
OK, this is probably a competitor in the race for the most pedantic discuss ever, but idnits does complain about two instances of "MAY NOT", which isn't a valid RFC2119 term. I believe both can be replaced by MUST NOT.

(If Lisa sticks this change into an RFC Editor Note, I promise to clear before Thursday.)
2008-12-01
10 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2008-11-19
10 Lisa Dusseault [Note]: 'Barry Leiba to be the expert reviewer for the registry this creates.' added by Lisa Dusseault
2008-11-17
10 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2008-11-17
10 Chris Newman
[Ballot comment]
Two fixes I believe would improve this document:

1. It "Updates: RFC 3834" because it changes the extension rules from
  IETF …
[Ballot comment]
Two fixes I believe would improve this document:

1. It "Updates: RFC 3834" because it changes the extension rules from
  IETF consensus to Specification Required.

2. The term "URI Header" is not defined anywhere.  I assume it means
  "Header field name and value extracted from the mailto URI," but it
  might be a good idea to include that (or a similar) definition in
  this specification.

Lisa: Who are you recommending as the expert reviewer for the new
      auto-submitted extension registry this creates?
2008-11-04
10 Lisa Dusseault Placed on agenda for telechat - 2008-12-04 by Lisa Dusseault
2008-11-04
10 Lisa Dusseault State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::External Party by Lisa Dusseault
2008-11-04
10 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Lisa Dusseault
2008-11-04
10 Lisa Dusseault Ballot has been issued by Lisa Dusseault
2008-11-04
10 Lisa Dusseault Created "Approve" ballot
2008-10-01
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-09.txt
2008-07-09
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-08.txt
2008-04-09
10 Lisa Dusseault State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::External Party from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Lisa Dusseault
2008-04-09
10 Lisa Dusseault Authors probably need to respond to IANA questions...
2008-03-31
10 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2008-03-26
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Hannes Tschofenig.
2008-03-21
10 Amanda Baber
IANA Last Call comments:

IANA has questions:

Please define the registration procedures for the new registry
created in section 6.2.

Action 1 (section 6.1):

Upon …
IANA Last Call comments:

IANA has questions:

Please define the registration procedures for the new registry
created in section 6.2.

Action 1 (section 6.1):

Upon approval of this document, the IANA will make the following
assignments in the "Sieve Notification Mechanisms" registry located
at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/sieve-notification

Mechanism name: mailto
Mechanism URI: RFC2368
Mechanism-specific tags: none
Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number: [RFC- ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-06.txt]
Person and email address to contact for further information:
Michael Haardt


Action 2 (sections 6.2, 6.3):

Upon approval of this document, the IANA will create the following
registry "Auto-Submitted Header Keywords" located at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/TBD

Registration Template:

To: iana@iana.org
Subject: Registration of new auto-submitted header field keyword
Keyword value: [the text value of the field]
Description: [a brief explanation of the purpose of this value]
Parameters: [list any keyword-specific parameters, specify their
meanings, specify whether they are required or optional; use "none"
if there are none]
Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number: [identifies the specification that defines the value being registered]
Contact: [name and email address to contact for further information]

Registration Procedures: UNKNOWN

Initial contents of this registry will be:

Keyword value: no
Description: Indicates that a message was NOT automatically
generated, but was created by a human. It is the equivalent to the
absence of an Auto-Submitted header altogether.
Parameters: none
Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number: RFC3834
Contact: Keith Moore

Keyword value: auto-generated
Description: Indicates that a message was generated by an
automatic process, and is not a direct response to another
message.
Parameters: none
Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number: RFC3834
Contact: Keith Moore

Keyword value: auto-replied
Description: Indicates that a message was automatically generated
as a direct response to another message.
Parameters: none
Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number: RFC3834
Contact: Keith Moore

Keyword value: sieve-notify
Description: Indicates that a message was generated by a Sieve
notification system.
Parameters: owner-email, owner-token. Both optional, both refer to
the owner of the Sieve script that generated this message. See the
relevant RFC for details.
Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number:
[RFC-sieve-notify-mailto-07]
Contact: Michael Haardt


We understand the above to be the only IANA Actions for this
document.
2008-03-20
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Hannes Tschofenig
2008-03-20
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Hannes Tschofenig
2008-03-18
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-07.txt
2008-03-17
10 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2008-03-17
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2008-03-17
10 Lisa Dusseault Last Call was requested by Lisa Dusseault
2008-03-17
10 Lisa Dusseault State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Lisa Dusseault
2008-03-17
10 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2008-03-17
10 (System) Last call text was added
2008-03-17
10 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2008-02-25
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2008-02-25
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-06.txt
2007-11-08
10 Lisa Dusseault State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Publication Requested by Lisa Dusseault
2007-10-16
10 Lisa Dusseault Draft Added by Lisa Dusseault in state Publication Requested
2007-10-05
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-05.txt
2007-07-12
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-04.txt
2007-07-08
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-03.txt
2007-03-08
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-02.txt
2006-10-18
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-01.txt
2005-12-13
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-00.txt