%% You should probably cite rfc8360 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-08,
    number =    {draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-08},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered/08/},
    author =    {Geoff Huston and George G. Michaelson and Carlos M. Martínez and Tim Bruijnzeels and Andy Newton and Daniel Shaw},
    title =     {{RPKI Validation Reconsidered}},
    pagetotal = 22,
    year =      2017,
    month =     jun,
    day =       26,
    abstract =  {This document specifies an alternative to the certificate validation procedure specified in RFC 6487 that reduces aspects of operational fragility in the management of certificates in the RPKI, while retaining essential security features. The use of this updated procedure is signalled by form of a set of alternative Object Identifiers (OIDs) indicating that the alternative version of RFC 3779 X.509 Extensions for IP Addresses and AS Identifiers, and certificate policy for the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RFC 6484) defined in this document should be used. Furthermore this document provides an alternative to ROA (RFC 6482), and BGPSec Router Certificate (BGPSec PKI Profiles - publication requested) validation.},
}