%% You should probably cite rfc9516 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-00, number = {draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-00}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/00/}, author = {Greg Mirsky and Wei Meng and Bhumip Khasnabish and Cui(Linda) Wang}, title = {{Active OAM for Service Function Chains in Networks}}, pagetotal = 15, year = 2018, month = nov, day = 5, abstract = {A set of requirements for active Operation, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) of Service Function Chains (SFCs) in networks is presented. Based on these requirements an encapsulation of active OAM message in SFC and a mechanism to detect and localize defects described. Also, this document updates RFC 8300 in the definition of O (OAM) bit in the Network Service Header (NSH) and defines how the active OAM message identified in SFC NSH.}, }