Link State protocols SPF trigger and delay algorithm impact on IGP micro-loops
draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-02
The information below is for an old version of the document | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (rtgwg WG) | |||
Last updated | 2016-06-16 (latest revision 2015-12-14) | ||||
Replaces | draft-litkowski-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement | ||||
Stream | IETF | ||||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||||
Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
||||
Reviews | |||||
Additional URLs |
|
||||
Stream | WG state | WG Document | |||
Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |||
Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||||
Telechat date | |||||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||||
Send notices to | (None) |
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-02.txt
Abstract
A micro-loop is a packet forwarding loop that may occur transiently among two or more routers in a hop-by-hop packet forwarding paradigm. In this document, we are trying to analyze the impact of using different Link State IGP implementations in a single network in regards of micro-loops. The analysis is focused on the SPF triggers and SPF delay algorithm.
Authors
Stephane Litkowski
(stephane.litkowski@orange.com)
Bruno Decraene
(bruno.decraene@orange.com)
Martin Horneffer
(Martin.Horneffer@telekom.de)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)