The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (rtgwg WG)
Authors Ahmed Bashandy  , Clarence Filsfils  , Prodosh Mohapatra 
Last updated 2016-06-10 (latest revision 2015-12-08)
Replaces draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic
Stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Additional Resources
- Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state WG Document
Document shepherd Rob Shakir
IESG IESG state Expired
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to "Rob Shakir" <rjs@rob.sh>

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at


In the network comprising thousands of iBGP peers exchanging millions of routes, many routes are reachable via more than one path. Given the large scaling targets, it is desirable to restore traffic after failure in a time period that does not depend on the number of BGP prefixes. In this document we proposed an architecture by which traffic can be re-routed to ECMP or pre-calculated backup paths in a timeframe that does not depend on the number of BGP prefixes. The objective is achieved through organizing the forwarding chains in a hierarchical manner and sharing forwarding elements among the maximum possible number of routes. The proposed technique achieves prefix independent convergence while ensuring incremental deployment, complete transparency and automation, and zero management and provisioning effort. It is noteworthy to mention that the benefits of BGP-PIC are hinged on the existence of more than one path whether as ECMP or primary-backup.


Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy@cisco.com)
Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil@cisco.com)
Prodosh Mohapatra (mpradosh@yahoo.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)