%% You should probably cite rfc9009 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-14, number = {draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-14}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao/14/}, author = {Rahul Jadhav and Pascal Thubert and Rabi Narayan Sahoo and Zhen Cao}, title = {{Efficient Route Invalidation}}, pagetotal = 22, year = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.year' **, month = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date' **, day = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.day' **, abstract = {This document explains the problems associated with the current use of NPDAO messaging and also discusses the requirements for an optimized route invalidation messaging scheme. Further a new proactive route invalidation message called as "Destination Cleanup Object" (DCO) is specified which fulfills requirements of an optimized route invalidation messaging.}, }