Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) and Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Status Mapping
draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-04
Yes
(Alexey Melnikov)
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Suresh Krishnan)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -01)
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-11 for -02)
Unknown
Agree with Mirja that other than the final mapping, section 2 seems mostly redundant with the IANA considerations section and could be removed.
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-12 for -02)
Unknown
Maybe it's obvious to everyone else, but what is the goal of these mappings? It would help to have a paragraph or two explaining that. (Or did I miss something?) Are the mappings reversible? -1, last paragraph: The MUST probably doesn't need a 2119 keyword. IIUC, it's a requirement on this draft, not on implementations.
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-11 for -02)
Unknown
Ersue, Mehmet (Nokia - DE/Munich) <mehmet.ersue@nokia.com> performed the opsdir review
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-10 for -01)
Unknown
A few minor comments: - I guess this doc should cite RFC5730 and RFC7482 (?) in the intro...? - I would propose to directly put the link to the registation in the introduction instead of using a citation ([rdap-json-values]) because I initially didn't realize that this not a doc. - And effectively you could even remove section 2 mostly or potentially even competely as all information are given (word-for-word) in the IANA consideration section. And thanks for the nice in in-depth shepherd write-up!
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown