%% You should probably cite rfc9334 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-rats-architecture-05, number = {draft-ietf-rats-architecture-05}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-architecture/05/}, author = {Henk Birkholz and Dave Thaler and Michael Richardson and Ned Smith and Wei Pan}, title = {{Remote Attestation Procedures Architecture}}, pagetotal = 36, year = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.year' **, month = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date' **, day = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.day' **, abstract = {In network protocol exchanges, it is often the case that one entity (a Relying Party) requires evidence about a remote peer to assess the peer's trustworthiness, and a way to appraise such evidence. The evidence is typically a set of claims about its software and hardware platform. This document describes an architecture for such remote attestation procedures (RATS).}, }