QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control
draft-ietf-quic-recovery-34
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2021-03-23 |
34 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from REF |
2021-03-18 |
34 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to REF from EDIT |
2021-02-04 |
34 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IANA Actions |
2021-02-03 |
34 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2021-02-03 |
34 | (System) | IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2021-02-03 |
34 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2021-02-03 |
34 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent |
2021-02-03 |
34 | Cindy Morgan | IESG has approved the document |
2021-02-03 |
34 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2021-02-03 |
34 | Magnus Westerlund | The related document are now ready. |
2021-02-03 |
34 | Magnus Westerlund | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup |
2021-02-03 |
34 | Magnus Westerlund | Ballot approval text was generated |
2021-01-14 |
34 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed |
2021-01-14 |
34 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-34.txt |
2021-01-14 |
34 | (System) | New version approved |
2021-01-14 |
34 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> |
2021-01-14 |
34 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2021-01-14 |
34 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2021-01-07 |
33 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation |
2021-01-07 |
33 | Martin Vigoureux | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Vigoureux |
2021-01-07 |
33 | Erik Kline | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Erik Kline |
2021-01-06 |
33 | Murray Kucherawy | [Ballot comment] Again, nicely done. And I particularly appreciated Section 4. |
2021-01-06 |
33 | Murray Kucherawy | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Murray Kucherawy |
2021-01-06 |
33 | Benjamin Kaduk | [Ballot comment] Another well-written QUIC document; thank you! (The last version of -recovery I read was quite some time ago, perhaps the -09, and left … [Ballot comment] Another well-written QUIC document; thank you! (The last version of -recovery I read was quite some time ago, perhaps the -09, and left me scratching my head quite often. This one is quite clear.) I put my usual editorial suggestions up at https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4685 Section 5.2 > Endpoints SHOULD set the min_rtt to the newest RTT sample after > persistent congestion is established. [...] Earlier we said that min_rtt was the minimum value observed "over the lifetime of the path", which seems in conflict with this behavior unless we somehow declare that the path is re-established after a persistent congestion event. Perhaps we could finesse the wording a bit in the former location (given that we go on to allow re-establishing (or refreshing) the min_rtt at other times as well)? (Appendix A.3 might be affected as well, if changes are made.) Section 5.3 > After the handshake is confirmed, any acknowledgement delays reported > by the peer that are greater than the peer's max_ack_delay are > attributed to unintentional but potentially repeating delays, such as > scheduler latency at the peer or loss of previous acknowledgements. I don't think I understand how loss of previous acknowledgements could induce a peer to delay sending an ack longer than its max_ack_delay after an ack-eliciting packet. Section 6.2.1 > A sender SHOULD restart its PTO timer every time an ack-eliciting > packet is sent or acknowledged, when the handshake is confirmed > (Section 4.1.2 of [QUIC-TLS]), or when Initial or Handshake keys are > discarded (Section 4.9 of [QUIC-TLS]). [...] If I understand correctly, "handshake is confirmed" and "handshake keys are discarded" occur simultaneously, thus it is redundant to list both. Section 6.2.3 > Endpoints > that do not cease retransmitting packets in response to > unauthenticated data risk creating an infinite exchange of packets. We may want to be more precise about what "unauthenticated data" means here, since in -transport we say that even Initial packets are "authenticated" in some sense. Section 6.2.4 > When a PTO timer expires, a sender MUST send at least one ack- > eliciting packet in the packet number space as a probe. [...] > [...] > When the PTO timer expires, an ack-eliciting packet MUST be sent. [...] These look redundant to me (which, of course, does not necessarily mean that there is no value in having both). Section 7.7 > Endpoints can implement pacing as they choose. A perfectly paced > sender spreads packets exactly evenly over time. For a window-based > congestion controller, such as the one in this document, that rate > can be computed by averaging the congestion window over the round- > trip time. Expressed as a rate in bytes: I cringed a little when I saw a rate being expressed as a unit expression with no time denominator, but am not sure how it might be improved. The best I can come up with is "bytes/time". Section 8.1 I guess in some sense the observed RTT is also a signal under the control of a (Dolev-Yao) attacker, in addition to the loss and ECN signals. Appendix A Should we say explicitly that '^' in the pseudocode is used to indicate exponentiation? |
2021-01-06 |
33 | Benjamin Kaduk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benjamin Kaduk |
2021-01-06 |
33 | Warren Kumari | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Warren Kumari |
2021-01-06 |
33 | Robert Wilton | [Ballot comment] Another well written QUIC document, thank you. |
2021-01-06 |
33 | Robert Wilton | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Wilton |
2021-01-06 |
33 | Éric Vyncke | [Ballot comment] Thank you for the work put into this document. Even for a non transport person like myself, I find the text easy to … [Ballot comment] Thank you for the work put into this document. Even for a non transport person like myself, I find the text easy to read. Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be appreciated), and some nits. I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric == COMMENTS == Does the QUIC WG intend to have a BCP-like document on how network devices on the path should handle buffers? E.g., QUIC ressembles a lot to TCP so nodes can apply back pressure with mechanisms similar to RED (but, AFAIK, RED is mainly applied to TCP traffic so not to QUIC/UDP). -- Abstract -- Should the QUIC version be specified ? -- Section 1 -- Suggest to specify version 1 for the 2nd sentence. This (too?) short introduction would benefit by mentioning UDP transport. == NITS == -- Section 7.2 -- "Endpoints SHOULD use an initial congestion window of 10 times the maximum datagram size (max_datagram_size), limited to the larger of 14720 bytes or twice the maximum datagram size. " The above text looks ambiguous to me especially with the ',' before 'limited'. Also, s/8 byte overhead/8-byte overhead/ ? |
2021-01-06 |
33 | Éric Vyncke | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke |
2021-01-05 |
33 | Roman Danyliw | [Ballot comment] Thanks to Derrell Piper for the SECDIR review. ** Section 3. Per “The encryption level indicates the packet number space, as described in … [Ballot comment] Thanks to Derrell Piper for the SECDIR review. ** Section 3. Per “The encryption level indicates the packet number space, as described in [QUIC-TRANSPORT ]”, I think that reference here is Section 4.* from [QUIC-TLS] as I can’t find a mapping between PNS and encryption levels as discussed here in [QUIC-TRANSPORT]. |
2021-01-05 |
33 | Roman Danyliw | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw |
2021-01-05 |
33 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2021-01-05 |
33 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot comment] Section 4: It might be good to add citations for the various features of TCP that are mentioned throughout the section. |
2021-01-05 |
33 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2021-01-05 |
33 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot comment] Thanks for an exceptionally well written and easy-to-read document. |
2021-01-05 |
33 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2021-01-04 |
33 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2020-12-23 |
33 | Martin Duke | [Ballot comment] Great document! It’s odd that sec 4.7 doesn’t mention RACK at all, as that’s headed to TCP standard. |
2020-12-23 |
33 | Martin Duke | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Duke |
2020-12-22 |
33 | Amanda Baber | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed |
2020-12-14 |
33 | Amy Vezza | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2021-01-07 |
2020-12-14 |
33 | Magnus Westerlund | IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup |
2020-12-14 |
33 | Magnus Westerlund | Ballot has been issued |
2020-12-14 |
33 | Magnus Westerlund | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Magnus Westerlund |
2020-12-14 |
33 | Magnus Westerlund | Created "Approve" ballot |
2020-12-14 |
33 | Magnus Westerlund | Ballot writeup was changed |
2020-12-13 |
33 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
2020-12-13 |
33 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-33.txt |
2020-12-13 |
33 | (System) | New version approved |
2020-12-13 |
33 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2020-12-13 |
33 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-12-13 |
33 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-12-02 |
32 | Vijay Gurbani | Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready with Nits. Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani. Sent review to list. |
2020-11-16 |
32 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed |
2020-11-16 |
32 | Sabrina Tanamal | (Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: The IANA Functions Operator has reviewed draft-ietf-quic-recovery-32, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that … (Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: The IANA Functions Operator has reviewed draft-ietf-quic-recovery-32, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that this document doesn't require any registry actions. While it's often helpful for a document's IANA Considerations section to remain in place upon publication even if there are no actions, if the authors strongly prefer to remove it, we do not object. If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible. Thank you, Sabrina Tanamal Senior IANA Services Specialist |
2020-11-16 |
32 | (System) | IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call |
2020-11-02 |
32 | Derrell Piper | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Derrell Piper. Sent review to list. |
2020-10-26 |
32 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Shwetha Bhandari |
2020-10-26 |
32 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Shwetha Bhandari |
2020-10-22 |
32 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Derrell Piper |
2020-10-22 |
32 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Derrell Piper |
2020-10-22 |
32 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Vijay Gurbani |
2020-10-22 |
32 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Vijay Gurbani |
2020-10-21 |
32 | Amy Vezza | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
2020-10-21 |
32 | Amy Vezza | The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2020-11-16): From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> CC: quic-chairs@ietf.org, quic@ietf.org, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, lars@eggert.org, draft-ietf-quic-recovery@ietf.org Reply-To: last-call@ietf.org … The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2020-11-16): From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> CC: quic-chairs@ietf.org, quic@ietf.org, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, lars@eggert.org, draft-ietf-quic-recovery@ietf.org Reply-To: last-call@ietf.org Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-quic-recovery-32.txt> (QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control) to Proposed Standard The IESG has received a request from the QUIC WG (quic) to consider the following document: - 'QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control' <draft-ietf-quic-recovery-32.txt> as Proposed Standard This document is part of a combined 26-day last call for multiple related documents that defines the QUIC protocol and the HTTP mapping onto QUIC. The documents are: - draft-ietf-quic-transport - draft-ietf-quic-recovery - draft-ietf-quic-tls - draft-ietf-quic-invariants - draft-ietf-quic-http - draft-ietf-quic-qpack Due to its GitHub-centric work style, the QUIC WG requests that LC review comments are individually filed as issues in the WG repository at https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts if at all possible. A summary email with URLs to the individual issue should then also be sent to the relevant mailing list (primarily last-call@ietf.org and quic@ietf.org). The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2020-11-16. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document describes loss detection and congestion control mechanisms for QUIC. Note to Readers Discussion of this draft takes place on the QUIC working group mailing list (quic@ietf.org (mailto:quic@ietf.org)), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/ search/?email_list=quic. Working Group information can be found at https://github.com/quicwg; source code and issues list for this draft can be found at https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/labels/-recovery. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-recovery/ The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2910/ |
2020-10-21 |
32 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2020-10-21 |
32 | Magnus Westerlund | Last call was requested |
2020-10-21 |
32 | Magnus Westerlund | Ballot approval text was generated |
2020-10-21 |
32 | Magnus Westerlund | Ballot writeup was generated |
2020-10-21 |
32 | Magnus Westerlund | IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup |
2020-10-21 |
32 | Magnus Westerlund | Last call announcement was changed |
2020-10-21 |
32 | Magnus Westerlund | Last call announcement was changed |
2020-10-21 |
32 | Magnus Westerlund | Last call announcement was changed |
2020-10-20 |
32 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed |
2020-10-20 |
32 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-32.txt |
2020-10-20 |
32 | (System) | New version approved |
2020-10-20 |
32 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> |
2020-10-20 |
32 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-10-20 |
32 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-10-12 |
31 | Magnus Westerlund | AD review comments sent to the WG mailing list as a list of github issues. |
2020-10-12 |
31 | Magnus Westerlund | IESG state changed to AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from AD Evaluation |
2020-09-25 |
31 | Magnus Westerlund | IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested |
2020-09-25 |
31 | Lars Eggert | Shepherd Writeup for QUIC “base drafts” 1. Summary This publication requests covers the following I-Ds that together define the QUIC protocol: - QUIC: A UDP-Based … Shepherd Writeup for QUIC “base drafts” 1. Summary This publication requests covers the following I-Ds that together define the QUIC protocol: - QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport, draft-ietf-quic-transport-31 - QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control, draft-ietf-quic-recovery-31 - Using TLS to Secure QUIC, draft-ietf-quic-tls-31 - Version-Independent Properties of QUIC, draft-ietf-quic-invariants-11 - Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 3 (HTTP/3), draft-ietf-quic-http-31 - QPACK: Header Compression for HTTP/3, draft-ietf-quic-qpack-18 All of these I-Ds are intended to become Proposed Standard RFCs, and that intended status is indicated in their respective title page headers. 2. Document Announcement Write-Up Technical Summary: QUIC is a standards-track, UDP-based, stream-multiplexing, encrypted transport protocol. Its main features are minimizing connection establishment and overall transport latency for applications such as HTTP/3, providing multiplexing without head-of-line blocking, requiring only changes to path endpoints to enable deployment, providing always-secure transport using TLS 1.3. This document set specifies the QUIC transport protocol and it version-independent invariants, its loss detection and recovery approach, its use of TLS1.3 for providing security, and a new version of HTTP that uses QUIC (HTTP/3), along with QPACK for header compression in that protocol. Working Group Summary: As can be expected, discussion on many aspects of QUIC was quite intense. The resulting consensus, however, was judged by the chairs to be both strong and broad. Document Quality: There are over twenty implementations of QUIC that are participating in interop testing, including all major web browsers and many server, CDN and standalone library implementations. The acknowledgements sections of the I-Ds highlight the individuals that made major contributions to a given document. Personnel: The document shepherds for the individual I-Ds are: - Lucas Pardue: - draft-ietf-quic-http-31 - draft-ietf-quic-qpack-18 - Lars Eggert: - draft-ietf-quic-transport-31 - draft-ietf-quic-recovery-31 - Mark Nottingham: - draft-ietf-quic-tls-31 - draft-ietf-quic-invariants-11 The responsible AD for the document set is Magnus Westerlund. 3. Document Shepherd Review The document shepherds extensively reviewed the documents before this publication request. 4. Document Shepherd Review Concerns The document shepherds have no concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews for these documents. 5. Broader Reviews Parts of the document set benefited from specialized reviews from the TLS, HTTP and transport IETF communities. 6. Document Shepherd General Concerns The document shepherds have no general concerns about these documents. 7. IPR Disclosure Obligation The editors of the I-Ds have all declared that they have filed any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. 8. Filed IPR Disclosures draft-ietf-quic-recovery has had an IPR disclosure filed on it. No resulting technical changes were argued for. 9. Strength of Consensus The consensus behind the document set is very strong, also as evidenced by the substantial number of existing implementations. The WG last calls were forwarded to the TLS and HTTP WGs, due to the topical relationships. 10. Discontent No discontent was voiced. 11. Document Nits The IDNits tool does not appear to be functioning correctly, both locally and using the Web service, so it’s difficult to ascertain whether its results are accurate (there are many “Failure fetching the file, proceeding without it.” errors). 12. Formal Review Criteria No formal review requirements are applicable to this document set. 13. Split References All references within this document set have been identified as either normative or informative. 14. Normative References The document set contains the following normative references to I-Ds: - draft-ietf-httpbis-cache - draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics All of these are on track for timely publication in their respective WGs. 15. Downward References The TLS document has the following downrefs: * RFC8439 (CHACHA) * AES 16. RFC Status Changes Publication of this document set will not change the status of any existing RFCs. 17. IANA Considerations Review The IANA considerations of the document set have been reviewed and no issues were identified. 18. New “Expert Review” Registries The document set defines several IANA registries that allow for “Provisional Registrations” and “Permanent Registrations”, which both require Expert review. The IESG should select subject matter experts for these registration types; candidates include the document editors and the individuals named as contributors in the acknowledgment sections. 19. Validation of Formal Language Parts No formal code exists in the document set. draft-ietf-quic-transport, draft-ietf-quic-recovery and draft-ietf-quic-qpack contain python-like pseudo code, but not at a level of detail that would lend itself to automated checking. 20. YANG The document set does not contain a YANG model. |
2020-09-25 |
31 | Lars Eggert | Responsible AD changed to Magnus Westerlund |
2020-09-25 |
31 | Lars Eggert | IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from In WG Last Call |
2020-09-25 |
31 | Lars Eggert | IESG state changed to Publication Requested from I-D Exists |
2020-09-25 |
31 | Lars Eggert | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
2020-09-25 |
31 | Lars Eggert | Shepherd Writeup for QUIC “base drafts” 1. Summary This publication requests covers the following I-Ds that together define the QUIC protocol: - QUIC: A UDP-Based … Shepherd Writeup for QUIC “base drafts” 1. Summary This publication requests covers the following I-Ds that together define the QUIC protocol: - QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport, draft-ietf-quic-transport-31 - QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control, draft-ietf-quic-recovery-31 - Using TLS to Secure QUIC, draft-ietf-quic-tls-31 - Version-Independent Properties of QUIC, draft-ietf-quic-invariants-11 - Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 3 (HTTP/3), draft-ietf-quic-http-31 - QPACK: Header Compression for HTTP/3, draft-ietf-quic-qpack-18 All of these I-Ds are intended to become Proposed Standard RFCs, and that intended status is indicated in their respective title page headers. 2. Document Announcement Write-Up Technical Summary: QUIC is a standards-track, UDP-based, stream-multiplexing, encrypted transport protocol. Its main features are minimizing connection establishment and overall transport latency for applications such as HTTP/3, providing multiplexing without head-of-line blocking, requiring only changes to path endpoints to enable deployment, providing always-secure transport using TLS 1.3. This document set specifies the QUIC transport protocol and it version-independent invariants, its loss detection and recovery approach, its use of TLS1.3 for providing security, and a new version of HTTP that uses QUIC (HTTP/3), along with QPACK for header compression in that protocol. Working Group Summary: As can be expected, discussion on many aspects of QUIC was quite intense. The resulting consensus, however, was judged by the chairs to be both strong and broad. Document Quality: There are over twenty implementations of QUIC that are participating in interop testing, including all major web browsers and many server, CDN and standalone library implementations. The acknowledgements sections of the I-Ds highlight the individuals that made major contributions to a given document. Personnel: The document shepherds for the individual I-Ds are: - Lucas Pardue: - draft-ietf-quic-http-31 - draft-ietf-quic-qpack-18 - Lars Eggert: - draft-ietf-quic-transport-31 - draft-ietf-quic-recovery-31 - Mark Nottingham: - draft-ietf-quic-tls-31 - draft-ietf-quic-invariants-11 The responsible AD for the document set is Magnus Westerlund. 3. Document Shepherd Review The document shepherds extensively reviewed the documents before this publication request. 4. Document Shepherd Review Concerns The document shepherds have no concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews for these documents. 5. Broader Reviews Parts of the document set benefited from specialized reviews from the TLS, HTTP and transport IETF communities. 6. Document Shepherd General Concerns The document shepherds have no general concerns about these documents. 7. IPR Disclosure Obligation The editors of the I-Ds have all declared that they have filed any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. 8. Filed IPR Disclosures draft-ietf-quic-recovery has had an IPR disclosure filed on it. No resulting technical changes were argued for. 9. Strength of Consensus The consensus behind the document set is very strong, also as evidenced by the substantial number of existing implementations. The WG last calls were forwarded to the TLS and HTTP WGs, due to the topical relationships. 10. Discontent No discontent was voiced. 11. Document Nits The IDNits tool does not appear to be functioning correctly, both locally and using the Web service, so it’s difficult to ascertain whether its results are accurate (there are many “Failure fetching the file, proceeding without it.” errors). 12. Formal Review Criteria No formal review requirements are applicable to this document set. 13. Split References All references within this document set have been identified as either normative or informative. 14. Normative References The document set contains the following normative references to I-Ds: - draft-ietf-httpbis-cache - draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics All of these are on track for timely publication in their respective WGs. 15. Downward References The TLS document has the following downrefs: * RFC8439 (CHACHA) * AES 16. RFC Status Changes Publication of this document set will not change the status of any existing RFCs. 17. IANA Considerations Review The IANA considerations of the document set have been reviewed and no issues were identified. 18. New “Expert Review” Registries The document set defines several IANA registries that allow for “Provisional Registrations” and “Permanent Registrations”, which both require Expert review. The IESG should select subject matter experts for these registration types; candidates include the document editors and the individuals named as contributors in the acknowledgment sections. 19. Validation of Formal Language Parts No formal code exists in the document set. draft-ietf-quic-transport, draft-ietf-quic-recovery and draft-ietf-quic-qpack contain python-like pseudo code, but not at a level of detail that would lend itself to automated checking. 20. YANG The document set does not contain a YANG model. |
2020-09-25 |
31 | Lars Eggert | Notification list changed to quic-chairs@ietf.org from Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> |
2020-09-24 |
31 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-31.txt |
2020-09-24 |
31 | (System) | New version approved |
2020-09-24 |
31 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> |
2020-09-24 |
31 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-09-24 |
31 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-09-23 |
30 | Lars Eggert | Notification list changed to Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> from Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com> |
2020-09-23 |
30 | Lars Eggert | Document shepherd changed to Lars Eggert |
2020-09-23 |
30 | Lars Eggert | Notification list changed to Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com> |
2020-09-23 |
30 | Lars Eggert | Document shepherd changed to Lars Eggert |
2020-09-09 |
30 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-30.txt |
2020-09-09 |
30 | (System) | New version approved |
2020-09-09 |
30 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> |
2020-09-09 |
30 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-09-09 |
30 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-06-09 |
29 | Lars Eggert | IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document |
2020-06-09 |
29 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-29.txt |
2020-06-09 |
29 | (System) | New version approved |
2020-06-09 |
29 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> |
2020-06-09 |
29 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-06-09 |
29 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-05-19 |
28 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-28.txt |
2020-05-19 |
28 | (System) | New version approved |
2020-05-19 |
28 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> |
2020-05-19 |
28 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-05-19 |
28 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-03-09 |
27 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-27.txt |
2020-03-09 |
27 | (System) | New version approved |
2020-03-08 |
27 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> |
2020-03-08 |
27 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-03-08 |
27 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-02-21 |
26 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-26.txt |
2020-02-21 |
26 | (System) | New version approved |
2020-02-21 |
26 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2020-02-21 |
26 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-02-21 |
26 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-01-21 |
25 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-25.txt |
2020-01-21 |
25 | (System) | New version approved |
2020-01-21 |
25 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2020-01-21 |
25 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2020-01-21 |
25 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2019-11-04 |
24 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-24.txt |
2019-11-04 |
24 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-11-03 |
24 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2019-11-03 |
24 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2019-11-03 |
24 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2019-09-11 |
23 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-23.txt |
2019-09-11 |
23 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-09-11 |
23 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2019-09-11 |
23 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2019-09-11 |
23 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2019-07-09 |
22 | Jana Iyengar | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-22.txt |
2019-07-09 |
22 | (System) | Forced post of submission |
2019-07-09 |
22 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2019-07-09 |
22 | Jana Iyengar | Uploaded new revision |
2019-07-08 |
21 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-21.txt |
2019-07-08 |
21 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-07-08 |
21 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2019-07-08 |
21 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2019-07-08 |
21 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2019-04-23 |
20 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-20.txt |
2019-04-23 |
20 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-04-23 |
20 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2019-04-23 |
20 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2019-04-23 |
20 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2019-03-11 |
19 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-19.txt |
2019-03-11 |
19 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-03-11 |
19 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2019-03-11 |
19 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2019-03-11 |
19 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2019-01-22 |
18 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-18.txt |
2019-01-22 |
18 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-01-22 |
18 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2019-01-22 |
18 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2019-01-22 |
18 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-12-18 |
17 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-17.txt |
2018-12-18 |
17 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-12-18 |
17 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2018-12-18 |
17 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-12-18 |
17 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-10-23 |
16 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-16.txt |
2018-10-23 |
16 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-10-23 |
16 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2018-10-23 |
16 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2018-10-23 |
16 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-10-23 |
16 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-10-23 |
16 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-10-23 |
16 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-10-03 |
15 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-15.txt |
2018-10-03 |
15 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-10-03 |
15 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2018-10-03 |
15 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-10-03 |
15 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-08-15 |
14 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-14.txt |
2018-08-15 |
14 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-08-14 |
14 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2018-08-14 |
14 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-08-14 |
14 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-06-27 |
13 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-13.txt |
2018-06-27 |
13 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-06-27 |
13 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2018-06-27 |
13 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-06-27 |
13 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-05-22 |
12 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-12.txt |
2018-05-22 |
12 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-05-22 |
12 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2018-05-22 |
12 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-05-22 |
12 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-04-17 |
11 | Jana Iyengar | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-11.txt |
2018-04-17 |
11 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-04-17 |
11 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2018-04-17 |
11 | Jana Iyengar | Uploaded new revision |
2018-04-17 |
11 | Jana Iyengar | Uploaded new revision |
2018-03-05 |
10 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-10.txt |
2018-03-05 |
10 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-03-04 |
10 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, quic-chairs@ietf.org |
2018-03-04 |
10 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-03-04 |
10 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2018-01-28 |
09 | Jana Iyengar | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-09.txt |
2018-01-28 |
09 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-01-28 |
09 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Janardhan Iyengar <jri@google.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2018-01-28 |
09 | Jana Iyengar | Uploaded new revision |
2018-01-28 |
09 | Jana Iyengar | Uploaded new revision |
2017-12-05 |
08 | Ian Swett | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-08.txt |
2017-12-05 |
08 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-12-05 |
08 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Janardhan Iyengar <jri@google.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2017-12-05 |
08 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2017-12-05 |
08 | Ian Swett | Uploaded new revision |
2017-11-14 |
07 | Martin Thomson | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-07.txt |
2017-11-14 |
07 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-11-14 |
07 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Janardhan Iyengar <jri@google.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2017-11-14 |
07 | Martin Thomson | Uploaded new revision |
2017-09-22 |
06 | Jana Iyengar | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-06.txt |
2017-09-22 |
06 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-09-22 |
06 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Janardhan Iyengar <jri@google.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2017-09-22 |
06 | Jana Iyengar | Uploaded new revision |
2017-08-16 |
05 | Martin Thomson | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-05.txt |
2017-08-16 |
05 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-08-15 |
05 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Janardhan Iyengar <jri@google.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2017-08-15 |
05 | Martin Thomson | Uploaded new revision |
2017-06-13 |
04 | Martin Thomson | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-04.txt |
2017-06-13 |
04 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-06-13 |
04 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Janardhan Iyengar <jri@google.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> |
2017-06-13 |
04 | Martin Thomson | Uploaded new revision |
2017-05-22 |
03 | Mark Nottingham | Added to session: interim-2017-quic-02 |
2017-05-21 |
03 | Martin Thomson | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-03.txt |
2017-05-21 |
03 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-05-21 |
03 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Janardhan Iyengar <jri@google.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, quic-chairs@ietf.org |
2017-05-21 |
03 | Martin Thomson | Uploaded new revision |
2017-03-29 |
02 | Mark Nottingham | Added to session: IETF-98: quic Thu-0900 |
2017-03-13 |
02 | Mike Bishop | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-02.txt |
2017-03-13 |
02 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-03-13 |
02 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Janardhan Iyengar <jri@google.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, quic-chairs@ietf.org |
2017-03-13 |
02 | Mike Bishop | Uploaded new revision |
2017-01-16 |
01 | Lars Eggert | Added to session: interim-2017-quic-01 |
2017-01-16 |
01 | Lars Eggert | Added to session: interim-2017-quic-01 |
2017-01-16 |
01 | Lars Eggert | Added to session: interim-2017-quic-01 |
2017-01-14 |
01 | Mike Bishop | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-01.txt |
2017-01-14 |
01 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-01-14 |
01 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: "Ian Swett" <ianswett@google.com>, "Janardhan Iyengar" <jri@google.com>, quic-chairs@ietf.org |
2017-01-14 |
01 | Mike Bishop | Uploaded new revision |
2016-11-28 |
00 | Mark Nottingham | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2016-11-28 |
00 | Mark Nottingham | Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None |
2016-11-28 |
00 | Mark Nottingham | This document now replaces draft-iyengar-quic-loss-recovery instead of None |
2016-11-28 |
00 | Jana Iyengar | New version available: draft-ietf-quic-recovery-00.txt |
2016-11-28 |
00 | (System) | WG -00 approved |
2016-11-28 |
00 | Jana Iyengar | Set submitter to "Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>", replaces to draft-iyengar-quic-loss-recovery and sent approval email to group chairs: quic-chairs@ietf.org |
2016-11-28 |
00 | Jana Iyengar | Uploaded new revision |