%% You should probably cite rfc4863 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-pwe3-wildcard-pw-type-02,
    number =    {draft-ietf-pwe3-wildcard-pw-type-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-wildcard-pw-type/02/},
    author =    {Luca Martini and George Swallow},
    title =     {{Wildcard Pseudowire Type}},
    pagetotal = 6,
    year =      2006,
    month =     oct,
    day =       17,
    abstract =  {Pseudowire signaling requires that the Pseudowire Type (PW Type) be identical in both directions. For certain applications the configuration of the PW Type is most easily accomplished by configuring this information at just one PW endpoint. In any form of LDP-based signaling, each PW endpoint must initiate the creation of a unidirectional LSP. In order to allow the initiation of these two LSPs to remain independent, a means is needed for allowing the PW endpoint (lacking a priori knowledge of the PW Type) to initiate the creation of an LSP. This document defines a Wildcard PW Type to satisfy this need. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}},
}