Skip to main content

Segmented Pseudowire
draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-18

Yes

(Ralph Droms)

No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Jari Arkko)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Tim Polk)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 18 and is now closed.

Ralph Droms Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Objection, Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2010-09-17) Unknown
Thanks for version 18 which addresses my remaining comments.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2009-09-10) Unknown
I also support Lars Eggerts discuss regarding congestion control. It seems that multi-segment in its various combinations have many potential ways of breaking the congestion control loop. Thus that fact and what can be done on the signalling plane by the S-PE is important.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection
No Objection (2009-09-10) Unknown
  The Gen-ART Review by Sean Turner on 31-Aug-2009 raises a few questions:

  - Do you really want 7 authors?  The RFC Editor prefers 5 or less.

  - Should the Introduction be Section 1?

  - Sec 7.4.1: Indicates the PW Switching Point description string is
    80 characters long.  Should it say more about the character set?

  - Sec 8.4.1: Figure shows both AC "Up" and AC "UP".  Should they all
    be "Up"?

  - Sec 16: s/Author's/Authors'

  - There are a couple of places where " , " should be changed to ", "
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown