%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-proto-wgchair-tracker-ext-03,
    number =    {draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-tracker-ext-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-tracker-ext/03/},
    author =    {Henrik Levkowetz and Allison J. Mankin and Brian E. Carpenter},
    title =     {{Requirements on I-D Tracker Extensions for Working Group Chairs}},
    pagetotal = 9,
    year =      2007,
    month =     feb,
    day =       8,
    abstract =  {This document describes the changes required to make it possible for working group chairs to update the I-D tracker during document shepherding, after the request for publication. It also describes additional requirements for the chairs to use the I-D tracker for managing WG documents from their earliest stages. Having the tracker support the working groups more fully is a primary benefit, but in addition, this moves towards the goal of providing an integrated view of document states from -00 to RFC publication.},
}