Skip to main content

Conveying Vendor-Specific Constraints in the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol
draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-11

Yes

(Stewart Bryant)

No Objection

(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Richard Barnes)
(Sean Turner)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stephen Farrell)

Recuse

(Adrian Farrel)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.

Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-12-18) Unknown
Thanks for the Management Considerations section.

Regards, the OPS AD.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-12-17) Unknown
For what it is worth, I agree with Robert Spark's Gen-ART review comment that some highlighting of the interoperability challenges of vendor-specific options might have been useful. I don't think it is a big problem in this case (and this seems to be confirmed by Adrian's reply) but some similar RFCs have talked about it. If you want to take a look at what has been done in the past, there's text in RFC 5094 Section 1 last two paragraphs, RFC 4243 Section 3 last paragraph, RFC 3588 Section 11.1.1 two last sentences, for instance. The general thrust is emphasising the local applicability of vendor information, encouraging documentation of vendor's information elements, and recommending standardisation when there's more general interest for the information in question.
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Abstain) Recuse
Recuse () Unknown