Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) Protocol Extensions for Usage with Point-to-Multipoint TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-13

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

Deborah Brungard Yes

(Ignas Bagdonas) No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Roman Danyliw (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2019-04-12)
No email
send info
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS.

Benjamin Kaduk (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2019-04-19)
No email
send info
Thank you for addressing my Discuss point!

(Suresh Krishnan) No Objection

Comment (2019-04-09 for -12)
* Section 7.2.

"The special value of all zeros for this TLV is used to refer to all paths pertaining to a particular PLSP-ID."

Can you clarify what fields are all zero? What would the length be?

(Mirja K├╝hlewind) No Objection

Comment (2019-04-04 for -12)
Just a quick clarification question on fragmentation: I'm wondering if it is really necessary to define a fragmentation mechanism/bit for each object separately (e.g also RFC8306) or if it would be more appropriate to allocate one bit in the common header? Just asking as I'm really not an expert here...

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection

(Adam Roach) No Objection

Martin Vigoureux No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection