%% You should probably cite rfc8745 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-10, number = {draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-10}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection/10/}, author = {Hariharan Ananthakrishnan and Siva Sivabalan and Colby Barth and Ina Minei and Mahendra Singh Negi}, title = {{PCEP Extensions for Associating Working and Protection LSPs with Stateful PCE}}, pagetotal = 16, year = 2019, month = sep, day = 1, abstract = {An active stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) is capable of computing as well as controlling via Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (MPLS LSP). Furthermore, it is also possible for an active stateful PCE to create, maintain, and delete LSPs. This document defines the PCEP extension to associate two or more LSPs to provide end-to-end path protection.}, }