%% You should probably cite rfc8745 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-00, number = {draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-00}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection/00/}, author = {Hariharan Ananthakrishnan and Siva Sivabalan and Colby Barth and Raveendra Torvi and Ina Minei and Edward Crabbe and Dhruv Dhody}, title = {{PCEP Extensions for MPSL-TE LSP Path Protection with stateful PCE}}, pagetotal = 14, year = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.year' **, month = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date' **, day = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.day' **, abstract = {A stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) is capable of computing as well as controlling via Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (MPLS LSP). Furthermore, it is also possible for a stateful PCE to create, maintain, and delete LSPs. This document describes PCEP extension to associate two or more LSPs to provide end-to-end path protection.}, }