Domain Subobjects for the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-12
Yes
(Deborah Brungard)
No Objection
(Alissa Cooper)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Ben Campbell)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -09)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -09)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -09)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-11-18 for -09)
Unknown
In Section 5.1, to be consistent with how IANA prefers registry URLs to be specified, please remove the string "/pcep.xhtml" from the three IANA URLs.
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -09)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -09)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -09)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-11-18 for -09)
Unknown
Thank you for working out new text for the security considerations section from the SecDir review. The new text is significantly better. https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06179.html
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -09)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-11-16 for -09)
Unknown
In this text: The new subobjects introduced by this document will not be understood by a legacy implementation. If one of the subobjects is received in a PCEP object that does not understand it, it will behave as described in Section 3.4.3. I think something is confused. Do PCEP objects understand subobjects? Or is this The new subobjects introduced by this document will not be understood by legacy implementations. If a legacy implementation receives one of the subobjects that it does not understand in a PCEP object, the legacy implementation will behave as described in Section 3.4.3. correct?
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -09)
Unknown
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -09)
Unknown