Concepts and Terminology for Peer-to-Peer SIP (P2PSIP)
draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-09
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2016-06-22
|
09 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2016-05-23
|
09 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR |
2016-05-11
|
09 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT |
2016-04-22
|
09 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
2016-04-22
|
09 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2016-04-21
|
09 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2016-04-21
|
09 | (System) | IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2016-04-21
|
09 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2016-04-21
|
09 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed |
2016-04-21
|
09 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2016-04-21
|
09 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2016-04-21
|
09 | Amy Vezza | Ballot approval text was generated |
2016-04-21
|
09 | Amy Vezza | Ballot writeup was changed |
2016-04-21
|
09 | David Bryan | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
2016-04-21
|
09 | David Bryan | New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-09.txt |
2016-03-23
|
08 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Tim Chown. |
2016-03-17
|
08 | Pete Resnick | Assignment of request for Last Call review by GENART to Pete Resnick was rejected |
2016-03-17
|
08 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation |
2016-03-17
|
08 | Cindy Morgan | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2016-03-17
|
08 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
2016-03-17
|
08 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] Thanks for sticking with it! A document such as this could be useful, given the complexity of RELOAD. |
2016-03-17
|
08 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2016-03-17
|
08 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2016-03-16
|
08 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2016-03-16
|
08 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2016-03-15
|
08 | Terry Manderson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson |
2016-03-15
|
08 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot comment] Thanks for doing this. I wish more of our protocols had high-level concept descriptions like this. - 1, first paragraph: I was slightly … [Ballot comment] Thanks for doing this. I wish more of our protocols had high-level concept descriptions like this. - 1, first paragraph: I was slightly surprised not to see the word "rendezvous" turn up here. It's not critical, but it's a term that has meaning to a lot of "conventional SIP " people. - 2.2, last paragraph: While I assume the client in the first sentence is the conventional SIP client mentioned further down the paragraph, the initial paragraph structure led me to expect you to call the special peer offering the SIP registrar service a "client". - 2.5, first paragraph: consider expanding "zeroconf" to "zero configuration" -6: I’m not going to push the matter this late in the process, but there might have been an opportunity to describe the security concepts of p2psip at a similar level of detail. |
2016-03-15
|
08 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2016-03-15
|
08 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2016-03-15
|
08 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2016-03-15
|
08 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2016-03-15
|
08 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2016-03-10
|
08 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Issues. Reviewer: Radia Perlman. |
2016-03-04
|
08 | Alissa Cooper | Ballot has been issued |
2016-03-04
|
08 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2016-03-04
|
08 | Alissa Cooper | Created "Approve" ballot |
2016-03-04
|
08 | Alissa Cooper | IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead |
2016-03-04
|
08 | (System) | IESG state changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call |
2016-02-29
|
08 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed |
2016-02-29
|
08 | Sabrina Tanamal | (Via drafts-lastcall-comment@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-08.txt, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that this … (Via drafts-lastcall-comment@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-08.txt, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions. While it's often helpful for a document's IANA Considerations section to remain in place upon publication even if there are no actions, if the authors strongly prefer to remove it, IANA does not object. If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible. Thank you, Sabrina Tanamal IANA Specialist ICANN |
2016-02-25
|
08 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Radia Perlman |
2016-02-25
|
08 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Radia Perlman |
2016-02-22
|
08 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Pete Resnick |
2016-02-22
|
08 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Pete Resnick |
2016-02-21
|
08 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Tim Chown |
2016-02-21
|
08 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Tim Chown |
2016-02-19
|
08 | Cindy Morgan | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
2016-02-19
|
08 | Cindy Morgan | The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" CC: draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts@ietf.org, br@brianrosen.net, alcoop@cisco.com, p2psip@ietf.org, p2psip-chairs@ietf.org Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org … The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" CC: draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts@ietf.org, br@brianrosen.net, alcoop@cisco.com, p2psip@ietf.org, p2psip-chairs@ietf.org Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Concepts and Terminology for Peer to Peer SIP) to Informational RFC The IESG has received a request from the Peer-to-Peer Session Initiation Protocol WG (p2psip) to consider the following document: - 'Concepts and Terminology for Peer to Peer SIP' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-03-04. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document defines concepts and terminology for the use of the Session Initiation Protocol in a peer-to-peer environment where the traditional proxy-registrar and message routing functions are replaced by a distributed mechanism. These mechanisms may be implemented using a distributed hash table or other distributed data mechanism with similar external properties. This document includes a high-level view of the functional relationships between the network elements defined herein, a conceptual model of operations, and an outline of the related problems addressed by the P2PSIP working group and the RELOAD protocol and SIP usage document defined by the working group. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2016-02-19
|
08 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2016-02-19
|
08 | Alissa Cooper | Ballot writeup was changed |
2016-02-19
|
08 | Alissa Cooper | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2016-03-17 |
2016-02-19
|
08 | Alissa Cooper | Last call was requested |
2016-02-19
|
08 | Alissa Cooper | Last call announcement was generated |
2016-02-19
|
08 | Alissa Cooper | Ballot approval text was generated |
2016-02-19
|
08 | Alissa Cooper | Ballot writeup was generated |
2016-02-19
|
08 | Alissa Cooper | IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup |
2016-02-11
|
08 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed |
2016-02-11
|
08 | David Bryan | New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-08.txt |
2016-01-27
|
07 | Alissa Cooper | IESG state changed to AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from AD Evaluation |
2015-11-25
|
07 | Alissa Cooper | IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested |
2015-11-01
|
07 | Brian Rosen | Shepherd Writeup for draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts, current version 7. Date of this writeup: November 31, 2015. Document Shepherd: Brian Rosen (1) This document is Informational. The … Shepherd Writeup for draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts, current version 7. Date of this writeup: November 31, 2015. Document Shepherd: Brian Rosen (1) This document is Informational. The document header indicates Informational. This document only contains explanatory information concerning the p2psip protocol and other documents and is properly classified as “Informational”. (2) Document Announcement Write-Up: Technical Summary: This document defines concepts and terminology for the use of the Session Initiation Protocol in a peer-to-peer environment where the traditional proxy-registrar and message routing functions are replaced by a distributed mechanism. These mechanisms may be implemented using a distributed hash table or other distributed data mechanism with similar external properties. This document includes a high-level view of the functional relationships between the network elements defined herein, a conceptual model of operations, and an outline of the related problems addressed by the P2PSIP working group and the RELOAD protocol [RFC6940] and SIP usage. Working Group Summary: This document has had a relatively long gestation period in the working group, and it fact languished for several years. After development of the protocol and other documents, it was felt that completing the concepts document would be helpful for readers of the protocol and other documents to understand the basic concepts behind the protocol. As result, this document was updated to reflect the evolution of the various documents and it now reflects the documented state of the protocol. There were no notable disagreements within the working group over the development of the document. Document Quality: The document was written by one of the original contributors to the entire p2psip effort, and has benefitted from review of the more active workgroup’s participants. I believe it accurately reflects the concepts behind the RELOAD protocol. Personnel: Brian Rosen is the Document Shepherd. Alissa Cooper is the Responsible Area Director. (3) I have completed a thorough review of the document and believe it is ready to be published. (4) Knowledgeable people have reviewed the document and no significant concerns were raised. All minor issues have been resolved. (5) This document only explains the concepts behind the protocol and thus has no concerns requiring specialized review. (6) Neither the work group nor I have any concerns or issues. (7) Each author has confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed. (8) There are no IPR disclosures filed on the draft. (9) As with many IETF working groups, interest in finishing has flagged, and we did struggle to get sufficient reviews. However, we had strong concurrence within the larger working group that the document should be published. There were no dissents. (10) There are no threatened appeals and no dissenters, strong or otherwise. (11) There are some minor nits that should be handled in normal RFC editor processing: the abstract has references which need to be turned into text descriptions. (12) This document does not define any MIBs, media types or URNs, and thus no reviews for those items is needed. (13) The references all informative. (14) There is a reference to other p2psip documents, all of which are in the final stages of review and publication. (15) See (14) above. (16) This document does not change the status of any RFCs. (17) This document orequires no IANA actions. (18) The document does not create any new registries. (19) This document does not contain any XML, BNF, MIB or other formal language constructs. The document does contain XML schemas. |
2015-11-01
|
07 | Brian Rosen | Responsible AD changed to Alissa Cooper |
2015-11-01
|
07 | Brian Rosen | IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up |
2015-11-01
|
07 | Brian Rosen | IESG state changed to Publication Requested |
2015-11-01
|
07 | Brian Rosen | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
2015-10-31
|
07 | Brian Rosen | Changed document writeup |
2015-10-14
|
07 | (System) | Notify list changed from "Brian Rosen" to (None) |
2015-07-31
|
07 | Carlos Jesús Bernardos | IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call |
2015-07-31
|
07 | Carlos Jesús Bernardos | Notification list changed to "Brian Rosen" <br@brianrosen.net> |
2015-07-31
|
07 | Carlos Jesús Bernardos | Document shepherd changed to Brian Rosen |
2015-07-06
|
07 | Carlos Jesús Bernardos | IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document |
2015-07-06
|
07 | Carlos Jesús Bernardos | Intended Status changed to Informational from None |
2015-05-08
|
07 | David Bryan | New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-07.txt |
2014-06-13
|
06 | David Bryan | New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-06.txt |
2013-07-12
|
05 | David Bryan | New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-05.txt |
2011-10-31
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-04.txt |
2011-04-28
|
04 | (System) | Document has expired |
2010-10-25
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-03.txt |
2008-07-07
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-02.txt |
2007-11-15
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-01.txt |
2007-07-03
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-00.txt |