%% You should probably cite rfc8665 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-24, number = {draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-24}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions/24/}, author = {Peter Psenak and Stefano Previdi and Clarence Filsfils and Hannes Gredler and Rob Shakir and Wim Henderickx and Jeff Tantsura}, title = {{OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing}}, pagetotal = 29, year = 2017, month = dec, day = 14, abstract = {Segment Routing (SR) allows a flexible definition of end-to-end paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of topological sub-paths, called "segments". These segments are advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF). This draft describes the OSPFv2 extensions required for Segment Routing.}, }