%% You should probably cite rfc8770 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-11,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-11},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit/11/},
    author =    {Keyur Patel and Padma Pillay-Esnault and Manish Bhardwaj and Serpil Bayraktar},
    title =     {{Host Router Support for OSPFv2}},
    pagetotal = 10,
    year =      2019,
    month =     nov,
    day =       17,
    abstract =  {The Open Shortest Path First Version 2 (OSPFv2) does not have a mechanism for a node to repel transit traffic if it is on the shortest path. This document defines a bit (Host-bit) that enables a router to advertise that it is a non-transit router. It also describes the changes needed to support the H-bit in the domain. In addition, this document updates RFC 6987 to advertise type-2 External and Not-So-Stubby-Area (NSSA) Link State Advertisements (LSAs) with a high cost in order to repel traffic effectively.},
}