%% You should probably cite rfc7777 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02, number = {draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag/02/}, author = {Shraddha Hegde and Harish Raghuveer and Hannes Gredler and Rob Shakir and Anton Smirnov and Zhenbin Li and Bruno Decraene}, title = {{Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF}}, pagetotal = 12, year = 2015, month = jun, day = 1, abstract = {This document describes an extension to OSPF protocol {[}RFC2328{]} to add an optional operational capability, that allows tagging and grouping of the nodes in an OSPF domain. This allows simplification, ease of management and control over route and path selection based on configured policies. This document describes an extension to OSPF protocol {[}RFC2328{]} to advertise per-node administrative tags. This optional operational capability allows to express and act upon locally-defined network policy which considers node properties conveyed by tags. Node tags may be used either by OSPF itself or by other applications consuming information propagated via OSPF. This document describes the protocol extensions to disseminate per- node administrative-tags to the OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 protocol. It provides example use cases of administrative node tags.}, }