Mechanisms for Optimizing Link Aggregation Group (LAG) and Equal-Cost Multipath (ECMP) Component Link Utilization in Networks
draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing-15
Yes
(Benoît Claise)
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Barry Leiba)
(Jari Arkko)
No Record
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 15 and is now closed.
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-16)
Unknown
Completely non-blocking comment... I agree with Adrian that there could be some confusion introduced with classification of flows as described in this document. It is exacerbated by the categorization illustrated in Figure 1. I will note that there is research that shows that a multitude of short-lived flows (regardless of their size) may cause more problems than the long-lived large flows focused on in this document.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-16)
Unknown
the concerns in Carlos' initial opsdir review were addressed
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-16)
Unknown
Thanks for addressing the SecDir review comments. https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg04851.html
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Record
No Record
(2014-10-16)
Unknown
short-lived large flows, are referred to as "small flows" in this document Is that really helpful and not-at-all-confusing? Well, at least you make the same statement three times in the document.