Skip to main content

Network Virtualization Overlays (NVO3) Encapsulation Considerations
draft-ietf-nvo3-encap-12

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: Matthew Bocci <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, andrew-ietf@liquid.tech, draft-ietf-nvo3-encap@ietf.org, matthew.bocci@nokia.com, nvo3-chairs@ietf.org, nvo3@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Document Action: 'Network Virtualization Overlays (NVO3) Encapsulation Considerations' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-nvo3-encap-12.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Network Virtualization Overlays (NVO3) Encapsulation Considerations'
  (draft-ietf-nvo3-encap-12.txt) as Informational RFC

This document is the product of the Network Virtualization Overlays Working
Group.

The IESG contact persons are Jim Guichard, Andrew Alston and John Scudder.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-encap/


Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   The IETF Network Virtualization Overlays (NVO3) Working Group Chairs
   and Routing Area Director chartered a design team to take forward the
   encapsulation discussion and see if there was potential to design a
   common encapsulation that addresses the various technical concerns.
   This document provides a record, for the benefit of the IETF
   community, of the considerations arrived at by the NVO3 encapsulation
   design team, which may be helpful with future deliberations by
   working groups over the choice of encapsulation formats.

   There are implications of having different encapsulations in real
   environments consisting of both software and hardware implementations
   and within and spanning multiple data centers.  For example, OAM
   functions such as path MTU discovery become challenging with multiple
   encapsulations along the data path.

   The design team recommended Geneve with a few modifications as the
   common encapsulation. This document provides more details,
   particularly in Section 7.

Working Group Summary

   Broad consensus on the document within the working group and issued raised seem to have been adequately addressed.

Document Quality

   The document influenced choices made within BESS though as per the shepards write up, this did not require cross document review.  Beyond that nothing of note.

Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Matthew Bocci. The
   Responsible Area Director is Andrew Alston.

RFC Editor Note