A YANG Data Model for Routing Management
draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-25
Yes
(Alia Atlas)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Mirja Kühlewind)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 24 and is now closed.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -24)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -24)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -24)
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -24)
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -24)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -24)
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-11-01 for -24)
Unknown
Should the reference to 6536. Be normative?
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -24)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -24)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -24)
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -24)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -24)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-11-02 for -24)
Unknown
If there exists a draft for a yang module that augments this in a way that includes cryptographic values (e.g. maybe for an IPsec VPN or something) then I think that'd be a nice addition to section 11 as an informative reference.
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-11-02 for -24)
Unknown
* Have you considered including support for the Route Information Option (RFC4191)? Seems like it would be useful. * default-lifetime is defined with a range of 0..9000 in this document but the upper limit will be raised to 65535 if and when draft-ietf-6man-maxra is approved. Is there a mechanism by which you can easily support this increased upper limit?
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -24)
Unknown