Label Switched Path (LSP) Self-Ping
draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-06
Yes
(Alia Atlas)
(Deborah Brungard)
No Objection
(Alvaro Retana)
(Barry Leiba)
(Ben Campbell)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Stephen Farrell)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -05)
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -05)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-10-14 for -05)
Unknown
Did the WG consider updating RF C3209? OLD: The node SHOULD be prepared to forward packets carrying the assigned label prior to sending the RESV message. NEW: The node SHOULD be prepared to forward packets carrying the assigned label prior to sending the RESV message. When an ingress LSR receives an RESV message, it MAY/SHOULD/MUST invoke the LSP Self-ping procedures [this-RFC-to-be] to verify that forwarding state has been installed on all downstream nodes.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-10-12 for -05)
Unknown
Bert Wijnen did the opsdir review.
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-10-14 for -05)
Unknown
I see that the Security Considerations section says, "operators SHOULD filter LSP Self-ping packets at network ingress points" I think it would be helpful to have the draft explicitly state the scope for this new function - within a single operator's network is my assumption. If that assumption is not correct, I may come back with more questions. There was also a suggestion made int he SecDir review that you may want to consider: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=secdir
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-10-14 for -05)
Unknown
I was looking at o The UDP Destination Port MUST be lsp-self-ping (8503) [IANA.PORTS] and wondering why this is a MUST. Is the answer that this mechanism works within an administrative domain, so you can just tell the other end what the port number needs to be?
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown