Clarification of Segment ID Sub-TLV Length for RFC 8287
draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-04
Yes
(Deborah Brungard)
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Barry Leiba)
(Mirja Kühlewind)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment
(2019-08-05 for -02)
Sent
** Section 4, per “The figures in section 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 of [RFC8287] are replaced by the below figures in section 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 respectively”: -- none of the diagram in Section 4.1, 4.2 or 4.3 are explicitly labeled as figures -- section 4.3 contains two “figures” (one is called a table in the text and the other has no designation). Which one of these is supposed to be a replacement for RFC8287 Section 5.3? ** Section 4.3. Assuming that the second figure is the replacement for RFC8287’s Section 5.3 figure, the length is still confusing to me. The figure in this draft appears to be a specific instance of the populated Sub-TLV. The existing figure in RFC8287 appears to be a generic depiction. The new figure doesn’t appear to be relevant (or presented incorrect information) if Adj Type = 1 and Protocol = 1 (for example). ** Section 4.3. Typo. s/Protocol =0/Protocol = 0/ ** Section 6. Recommend clarifying that there are no additional security considerations (not that there aren’t any). s/This document updates [RFC8287] and does not introduce any security considerations/This document updates [RFC8287] and does not introduce any additional security considerations/
Warren Kumari
No Objection
Comment
(2019-08-07 for -02)
Not sent
Good catch from the Gen-Art review, this needs to be fixed.
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -02)
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Not sent
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2019-08-27)
Sent
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS.
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Not sent
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Not sent
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2019-08-07 for -02)
Sent
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Not sent
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2019-08-08 for -03)
Sent
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS.