Using IPsec between Mobile and Correspondent IPv6 Nodes
draft-ietf-mip6-cn-ipsec-08

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
08 (System) Notify list changed from mext-chairs@ietf.org,Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr,jeanmichel.combes@orange-ftgroup.com to mext-chairs@ietf.org
2012-08-22
08 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
08 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Abstain position for Sam Hartman
2012-08-22
08 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2010-04-27
08 (System) Document has expired
2010-04-26
08 Jari Arkko State Changes to Dead from IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Jari Arkko
2010-04-26
08 Jari Arkko
I have decided to move this draft to state Dead, because very little
has happened on it over time, and because in my personal opinion ...
2010-01-25
08 Jari Arkko
I finally had some time to read the new version in detail. I do have a number of question marks. At this point I'd like ...
2008-09-08
08 Jari Arkko State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2008-09-08
08 Jari Arkko State Change Notice email list have been change to mext-chairs@tools.ietf.org,Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr,jeanmichel.combes@orange-ftgroup.com from mip6-chairs@tools.ietf.org,Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr,jeanmichel.combes@orange-ftgroup.com
2008-08-25
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mip6-cn-ipsec-08.txt
2008-05-08
08 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2008-05-08
08 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2008-03-14
08 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sam Hartman has been changed to Abstain from Discuss by Sam Hartman
2008-03-11
08 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
[This is a revised discuss; I am assuming Sam Hartman's discuss position in addition
to my original issues.  Sam's issues were appended as ...
2008-03-10
08 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Tim Polk
2008-02-23
08 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2008-02-23
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mip6-cn-ipsec-07.txt
2007-11-22
08 Jari Arkko State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2007-11-22
08 Jari Arkko
I was unable to understand Section 6, and overall prefered the edits that J-M and me worked in Paris, as opposed to the ones in ...
2007-11-16
08 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2007-11-16
08 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2007-11-16
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mip6-cn-ipsec-06.txt
2007-09-07
08 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Tim Polk
2007-09-07
08 Jari Arkko State Change Notice email list have been change to mip6-chairs@tools.ietf.org,Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr,jeanmichel.combes@orange-ftgroup.com from mip6-chairs@tools.ietf.org,Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr,jeanmichel.combes@orange-ft.com
2007-09-07
08 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2007-09-06
2007-09-06
08 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2007-09-06
08 Sam Hartman
[Ballot discuss]
I do not understand how this document meets its stated security
objectives.  In particular, this spec claims to be an alternative to
the ...
2007-09-06
08 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sam Hartman
2007-09-06
08 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
Section 6 says:
  >
  > This document considers only IKE where it is used for mobility
  > purpose.  Peer addresses ...
2007-09-06
08 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
Section 6 says:
  >
  > This document considers only IKE where it is used for mobility
  > purpose.  Peer addresses ...
2007-09-06
08 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
Section 6 says:
  >
  > This document considers only IKE where it is used for mobility
  > purpose.  Peer addresses ...
2007-09-06
08 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2007-09-06
08 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley
2007-09-06
08 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
I would like to clarify the impact of this specification on implementations of RFC 3775.

As I understand it, using IPsec between the ...
2007-09-06
08 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2007-09-06
08 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson
2007-09-06
08 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2007-09-06
08 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2007-09-05
08 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2007-09-05
08 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2007-09-04
08 Amanda Baber IANA Last Call comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we
understand this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2007-09-04
08 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2007-09-04
08 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Ward
2007-09-04
08 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2007-09-04
08 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 4., paragraph 1:
>    This document amends the Mobile IPv6 [RFC3775] section 9.3.1 by
>    adding a second way (other ...
2007-09-04
08 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2007-09-03
08 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2007-09-03
08 Jari Arkko State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Jari Arkko
2007-09-03
08 Jari Arkko No Last Call comments.
2007-08-31
08 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2007-08-21
08 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Glen Zorn
2007-08-21
08 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Glen Zorn
2007-08-17
08 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2007-08-17
08 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2007-08-17
08 Jari Arkko [Note]: 'AD Sponsored submission. There is no Document Shepherd.' added by Jari Arkko
2007-08-17
08 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-09-06 by Jari Arkko
2007-08-17
08 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2007-08-17
08 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued by Jari Arkko
2007-08-17
08 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2007-08-17
08 Jari Arkko State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2007-08-17
08 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested by Jari Arkko
2007-08-17
08 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2007-08-17
08 (System) Last call text was added
2007-08-17
08 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2007-08-17
08 Jari Arkko Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from Experimental
2007-08-17
08 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2007-08-17
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mip6-cn-ipsec-05.txt
2007-03-14
08 Jari Arkko State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2007-03-14
08 Jari Arkko
3rd AD review:

I looked at the new revision. I wanted to move forward with
it, but it still has two issues:

1. The security ...
2007-03-01
08 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2007-03-01
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mip6-cn-ipsec-04.txt
2007-01-03
08 Jari Arkko State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2007-01-03
08 Jari Arkko
New AD review:

like the new applicability statement and other
changes you made in the draft. However, there
are still some issues from my previous ...
2007-01-02
08 Jari Arkko Intended Status has been changed to Experimental from Proposed Standard
2007-01-02
08 Jari Arkko State Change Notice email list have been change to mip6-chairs@tools.ietf.org,Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr,jeanmichel.combes@orange-ft.com from mip6-chairs@tools.ietf.org
2007-01-02
08 Jari Arkko
This is the July 06 AD review:

In general, the document is in reasonable shape for something
to be published as Experimental (my current assumption), ...
2006-08-03
08 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2006-08-03
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mip6-cn-ipsec-03.txt
2006-07-05
08 Jari Arkko State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2006-07-05
08 Jari Arkko
July 3, 2006: Charter proposal for MIP6 posted to the WG list. Suggests that this document NOT be a part of the charter, but taken ...
2006-06-19
08 Dinara Suleymanova
PROTO Write-up

1) Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the ID and do
they believe this ID is sufficiently baked to forward to ...
2006-06-16
08 Jari Arkko
MIP6 charter needs revision, this and a few other documents are not really listed in the current charter. The charter will be updated and then ...
2006-06-16
08 Jari Arkko Draft Added by Jari Arkko in state AD Evaluation
2005-12-21
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mip6-cn-ipsec-02.txt
2005-06-27
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mip6-cn-ipsec-01.txt
2005-01-11
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mip6-cn-ipsec-00.txt