Summary: Has enough positions to pass.
A few questions on unexpected values: ** Section 3. How do the maximum and minimum latency fields relate? For example, what happens if a receiver gets a message where the maximum latency is smaller than the minimum latency. ** Section 3. How do the latency data item and the latency range item relate? For example, what happens if a receiver gets a message that has both a latency data item and a latency range data item, and the reported latency is outside of the latency range?
Roman's questions are good questions.
I assume/understand that the measurement/calculation of the min/max values is implementation specific (as RFC8175 also states for the latency data). However, I think it would be could to state this explicitly and maybe also give some hints what to expect, e.g. it could be the 90% quantile rather than the absolute min/max.
Thank you for this short and concise document. I just wonder whether the packet size is taken into account for the minimum and maximum latency if compression/serialization is taken into account the measurement.