Skip to main content

Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Latency Range Extension
draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-05

Yes

(Alvaro Retana)

No Objection

Warren Kumari
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Barry Leiba)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Martin Vigoureux)
(Suresh Krishnan)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2019-08-04 for -04) Sent
A few questions on unexpected values:

** Section 3.  How do the maximum and minimum latency fields relate?  For example, what happens if a receiver gets a message where the maximum latency is smaller than the minimum latency.

** Section 3.  How do the latency data item and the latency range item relate?  For example, what happens if a receiver gets a message that has both a latency data item and a latency range data item, and the reported latency is outside of the latency range?
Warren Kumari
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2019-07-13 for -04) Sent
Thank you for this short and concise document.

I just wonder whether the packet size is taken into account for the minimum and maximum latency if compression/serialization is taken into account the measurement.
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -04) Unknown

                            
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -04) Not sent

                            
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -04) Not sent

                            
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -04) Not sent

                            
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2019-08-07 for -04) Not sent
Roman's questions are good questions.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -04) Not sent

                            
Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -04) Not sent

                            
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2019-07-30 for -04) Sent
I assume/understand that the measurement/calculation of the min/max values is implementation specific (as RFC8175 also states for the latency data). However, I think it would be could to state this explicitly and maybe also give some hints what to expect, e.g. it could be the 90% quantile rather than the absolute min/max.
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -04) Not sent