Alternative Elliptic Curve Representations
|Document||Type||Active Internet-Draft (lwig WG)|
|Last updated||2021-08-10 (latest revision 2021-06-09)|
|Stream||Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)|
|Formats||pdf htmlized bibtex|
|Stream||WG state||Submitted to IESG for Publication|
|Document shepherd||Mohit Sethi|
|Shepherd write-up||Show (last changed 2021-05-10)|
|IESG||IESG state||Waiting for Writeup|
Has a DISCUSS. Has enough positions to pass once DISCUSS positions are resolved.
|Responsible AD||Erik Kline|
|Send notices to||Mohit Sethi <email@example.com>|
|IANA||IANA review state||IANA - Not OK|
|IANA expert review state||Issues identified|
|IANA expert review comments||Expert comments: OIDs have been approved. JOSE experts had approved version 12, but new reviews are pending. A COSE expert writes that he hasn't seen a detailed response to his February review and adds, "As I remember the overall conclusion the COSE WG meeting Feb 17 confirmed that registrations should follow current practice, and that, e.g., ES256K is an exception not to be followed."|
Error; cannot read 'draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-21.txt'