%% You should probably cite rfc6830 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-lisp-23,
    number =    {draft-ietf-lisp-23},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp/23/},
    author =    {Dino Farinacci and Vince Fuller and David Meyer and Darrel Lewis},
    title =     {{Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)}},
    pagetotal = 97,
    year =      2012,
    month =     may,
    day =       5,
    abstract =  {This draft describes a network layer based protocol that enables separation of IP addresses into two new numbering spaces: Endpoint Identifiers (EIDs) and Routing Locators (RLOCs). No changes are required to either host protocol stacks or to the "core" of the Internet infrastructure. LISP can be incrementally deployed, without a "flag day", and offers traffic engineering, multi-homing, and mobility benefits to early adopters, even when there are relatively few LISP-capable sites. Design and development of LISP was largely motivated by the problem statement produced by the October 2006 IAB Routing and Addressing Workshop.},
}