Locator/ID Separation Protocol Delegated Database Tree (LISP-DDT)
draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-09
Yes
(Deborah Brungard)
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Ben Campbell)
(Benoît Claise)
(Jari Arkko)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Suresh Krishnan)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -08)
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-24 for -08)
Unknown
I have no objections to the publication of this document. However, I do wonder why an extension to the DNS infrastructure wasn't used instead. The Gen-ART review provided a significant set of good comments that should be taken into consideration.
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-26 for -08)
Unknown
Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> performed the opsdir review
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-27 for -08)
Unknown
Would it be worth it to potentially think about/document potential attacks against this system? I didn't think myself about how such an attack could look like but given that location and identity are potential sensitive data it might be worth it...
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-01-20)
Unknown
Thanks for handling the sig alg issue.
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown