%% You should probably cite rfc7796 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-08, number = {draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-08}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree/08/}, author = {Yuanlong Jiang and Lucy Yong and Manuel Paul}, title = {{Ethernet-Tree (E-Tree) Support in Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)}}, pagetotal = 24, year = 2015, month = aug, day = 20, abstract = {A generic Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) solution which uses VLANs to indicate root or leaf traffic is specified for Ethernet- Tree (E-Tree) services. A VPLS Provider Edge (PE) model is illustrated as an example for the solution. In the solution, E-Tree VPLS PEs are interconnected by PWs which carry the VLAN indicating the E-Tree attribute, the MAC address based Ethernet forwarding engine and the PW work in the same way as in RFC 4762 and RFC 4448 respectively. A signaling mechanism is further described for E-Tree capability and VLAN mapping negotiation.}, }