%% You should probably cite rfc8667 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-06, number = {draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-06}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions/06/}, author = {Stefano Previdi and Clarence Filsfils and Ahmed Bashandy and Hannes Gredler and Stephane Litkowski and Bruno Decraene and Jeff Tantsura}, title = {{IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing}}, pagetotal = 39, year = 2015, month = dec, day = 14, abstract = {Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of topological sub-paths, called "segments". These segments are advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF). This draft describes the necessary IS-IS extensions that need to be introduced for Segment Routing.}, }