The tel URI for Telephone Numbers
draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-09
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-22
|
09 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Bill Fenner |
2012-08-22
|
09 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ted Hardie |
2004-08-17
|
09 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2004-08-17
|
09 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2004-08-17
|
09 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2004-08-17
|
09 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2004-08-17
|
09 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza |
2004-08-16
|
09 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ted Hardie |
2004-07-20
|
09 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bill Fenner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Bill Fenner |
2004-06-29
|
09 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-09.txt |
2004-06-11
|
09 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-06-10 |
2004-06-10
|
09 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from Waiting for Writeup by Amy Vezza |
2004-06-10
|
09 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Bert Wijnen |
2004-06-10
|
09 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot comment] 5.1.1: contradictory -- clarify last paragraph. (Why is there extra indentation?) When you say "cannot", do you mean "MUST NOT" or "SHOULD NOT"? … [Ballot comment] 5.1.1: contradictory -- clarify last paragraph. (Why is there extra indentation?) When you say "cannot", do you mean "MUST NOT" or "SHOULD NOT"? 5.1.3: Why (backslash)# instead of # 5.1.5: Extra indentation |
2004-06-10
|
09 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten |
2004-06-10
|
09 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-06-10
|
09 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2004-06-10
|
09 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot comment] Question: Does this doc obsolete/replace 2806, Or is it just revising a piece of 2806, so it basically updates 2806? Whatever the answer, … [Ballot comment] Question: Does this doc obsolete/replace 2806, Or is it just revising a piece of 2806, so it basically updates 2806? Whatever the answer, it should probably be mentioned in teh abstract. |
2004-06-10
|
09 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
2004-06-10
|
09 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin |
2004-06-10
|
09 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot comment] Reviewed by Mark Allman, gen-ART |
2004-06-10
|
09 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-06-09
|
09 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot discuss] The "reserved" and "uric" productions use '|' for alternation; '/' is correct in ABNF (and all of the other productions use those). This … [Ballot discuss] The "reserved" and "uric" productions use '|' for alternation; '/' is correct in ABNF (and all of the other productions use those). This can easily be fixed by an RFC Editor note. |
2004-06-09
|
09 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
2004-06-09
|
09 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin |
2004-06-09
|
09 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Russ Housley |
2004-06-09
|
09 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] Please spell out IVR. It is only used once. The document does uses columbia.edu in places where example.com ought to be … [Ballot comment] Please spell out IVR. It is only used once. The document does uses columbia.edu in places where example.com ought to be used. The use of quotes is very inconsistent in this document. I kept wondering if there was a reason, but I finally conclude that there is not any meaning to the various styles. Please pick one style and use it everywhere. The quoted string "tel" appears at least three different ways in various places: 1. The ``tel'' URI ... 2. The "tel" URI ... 3. The 'tel' URI ... |
2004-06-09
|
09 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
2004-06-08
|
09 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot comment] 5.1.1: contradictory -- clarify last paragraph. (Why is there extra indentation?) When you say "cannot", do you mean "MUST NOT" or "SHOULD NOT"? … [Ballot comment] 5.1.1: contradictory -- clarify last paragraph. (Why is there extra indentation?) When you say "cannot", do you mean "MUST NOT" or "SHOULD NOT"? 5.1.3: Why # instead of # 5.1.5: Extra indentation |
2004-06-08
|
09 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin |
2004-06-07
|
09 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot comment] The document uses a number of telephone numbers which are not in the example sets (e.g. 555-1234, which is allocated according to http://www.nanpa.com/nas/public/ … [Ballot comment] The document uses a number of telephone numbers which are not in the example sets (e.g. 555-1234, which is allocated according to http://www.nanpa.com/nas/public/ form555MasterReport.do?method=display555MasterReport). I'm not sure what to do about that , though, as it would be very hard to give the range of uses while sticking to the relatively small number of allocations for examples (I know of UK and NANP allocations, but cannot readily suggest others). Do folks think a disclaimer of some kind is in order here, or should this just be left as-is? |
2004-06-07
|
09 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot discuss] Section 3 of the document discusses URI syntax, and uses the phrase "escaped" to describe how delimeters are treated. This section of 2396 … [Ballot discuss] Section 3 of the document discusses URI syntax, and uses the phrase "escaped" to describe how delimeters are treated. This section of 2396 was extensively revised in 2396bis, after the old language led to considerable confusion. The new phrasings, based on "percent encoding" and "decoding" specific characters seem to be clearer, especially in cases where the characters may appear both percent encoded and as delimeters. See: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-05.txt (Section 2). I believe the author could use the new language without changing which document is the normative reference, since the characters themselves have not changed. I would appreciate the author considering it. |
2004-06-07
|
09 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
2004-06-07
|
09 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
2004-06-03
|
09 | Jon Peterson | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-06-10 by Jon Peterson |
2004-06-03
|
09 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jon Peterson |
2004-06-03
|
09 | Jon Peterson | Ballot has been issued by Jon Peterson |
2004-06-03
|
09 | Jon Peterson | Created "Approve" ballot |
2004-06-02
|
08 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-08.txt |
2004-05-06
|
09 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system |
2004-04-22
|
09 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2004-04-22
|
09 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2004-04-21
|
09 | Jon Peterson | Last Call was requested by Jon Peterson |
2004-04-21
|
09 | Jon Peterson | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Jon Peterson |
2004-04-21
|
09 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2004-04-21
|
09 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2004-04-21
|
09 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2004-04-14
|
09 | Jon Peterson | State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Jon Peterson |
2004-04-14
|
09 | Jon Peterson | Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from None |
2004-04-12
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-07.txt |
2004-04-08
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-06.txt |
2004-03-23
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-05.txt |
2004-03-10
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-04.txt |
2004-02-16
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-03.txt |
2003-09-16
|
09 | Jon Peterson | Draft Added by Jon Peterson |
2003-07-02
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-02.txt |
2003-06-27
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-01.txt |
2003-06-24
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-00.txt |