Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI) Corrections and Clarifications
draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-09
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-22
|
09 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Chris Newman |
2012-08-22
|
09 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley |
2007-07-19
|
09 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor |
2007-07-19
|
09 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress |
2007-07-18
|
09 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on ADs |
2007-07-16
|
09 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on ADs from Waiting on Authors |
2007-07-16
|
09 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2007-07-11
|
09 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors |
2007-06-29
|
09 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2007-06-29
|
09 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2007-06-27
|
09 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2007-06-27
|
09 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2007-06-27
|
09 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2007-06-27
|
09 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2007-06-26
|
09 | Lars Eggert | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Lars Eggert |
2007-06-26
|
09 | Magnus Westerlund | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-06-25
|
09 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley |
2007-06-25
|
09 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2007-06-25
|
09 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-09.txt |
2007-06-08
|
09 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Amy Vezza |
2007-06-08
|
09 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2007-06-07 |
2007-06-07
|
09 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
2007-06-07
|
09 | Chris Newman | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Chris Newman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Chris Newman |
2007-06-07
|
09 | Lisa Dusseault | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault |
2007-06-07
|
09 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley |
2007-06-07
|
09 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
2007-06-07
|
09 | Chris Newman | [Ballot discuss] Who is the expert reviewer? |
2007-06-07
|
09 | Chris Newman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Chris Newman |
2007-06-07
|
09 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Tom Yu. |
2007-06-07
|
09 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson |
2007-06-06
|
09 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] From Gen-ART Review by From: Suresh Krishnan Summary: This draft is ready for publication, but I have some suggestions. Comments: … [Ballot comment] From Gen-ART Review by From: Suresh Krishnan Summary: This draft is ready for publication, but I have some suggestions. Comments: Overall the draft is well written and has a really well written IANA Considerations section. Minor ===== * Section 4.1.2 c "c. Should receive the TMF Response concluding all the tasks in the set of affected tasks. " I am not sure of the intent of the sentence, but I believe it to be normative. So I think the "Should" needs to be replaced with a SHOULD. * It is really unclear from the draft how to differentiate between the following types of information - Updates to RFC3720 - New behavior on top of RFC3720 - Clarifications and implementation advice since they are intermingled throughout the document. * For section 11.2 iSCSI Opcodes, the document mentions the following "Fields to record in the registry: Assigned value, Who can originate (Initiator or Target), Operation Name and its associated RFC reference" Since the op codes can also be assigned using the Expert Review process, it should probably mention that the RFC reference is optional. Editorial ========= * RFC2119 occurs twice in the references. Once as normative and once as informative |
2007-06-06
|
09 | Russ Housley | [Ballot discuss] Please add a section that lists the updates to RFC 3720. It will really help people trying to make updates to … |
2007-06-06
|
09 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica |
2007-06-06
|
09 | Russ Housley | [Ballot discuss] Section 14 says: > > The type of authentication deployed is a local decision made by the > server operator. … [Ballot discuss] Section 14 says: > > The type of authentication deployed is a local decision made by the > server operator. Clients are likely to face authentication schemes > that vary across server deployments. At a minimum, client and server > implementations MUST be capable of being configured to use HTTP Basic > Authentication [RFC2617] in conjunction with a TLS [RFC2246] > connection as defined in [RFC2818] (but note that [RFC2246] has been > superseded by [RFC4346]). See [RFC4346] for more information on TLS. > The specification ought to say that it MUST support TLS 1.0 [RFC2246] or a sunsequent standards-track version of TLS, and that it MUST also support the conventions for using HTTP over TLS [RFC2818]. |
2007-06-06
|
09 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
2007-06-06
|
09 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sam Hartman |
2007-06-06
|
09 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk |
2007-06-05
|
09 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings |
2007-06-05
|
09 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu |
2007-06-05
|
09 | Ross Callon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon |
2007-06-01
|
09 | Yoshiko Fong | Last Call Comments: Upon approval of this document, the IANA will take the following Actions: Action 1 (Section 11.2) Upon approval of this document, the … Last Call Comments: Upon approval of this document, the IANA will take the following Actions: Action 1 (Section 11.2) Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters create a new sub-registry "iSCSI Opcodes" Namespace details: Numerical values that can fit in one octet with most significant two bits (bits 0 and 1) already designated by [RFC3720], bit 0 being reserved and bit 1 for immediate delivery. Bit 2 is designated to identify the originator of the opcode. Bit 2 = 0 for initiator and Bit 2 = 1 for target Allocation request guidance to requesters: 1) If initiator opcode and target opcode to identify the request and response of a new type of protocol operation are requested, assign the same lower five bits (i.e. Bit 3 through Bit 7) for both opcodes, e.g. 0x13 and 0x33 2) If only the initiator opcode or target opcode is requested to identify a one-way protocol message (i.e. request without a response or a "response" without a request), assign an unused number from the appropriate category (i.e. Bit 2 set to 0 or 1 for initiator category or target category) and add the other pair member (i.e. same opcode with Bit 2 set to 1 or 0, respectively) to "Reserved to IANA" list. 3) If there are no other opcodes available to assign on a request for a new opcode except the reserved opcodes in the "Reserved to IANA" list, allocate the opcodes from the appropriate category (initiator or target). Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Opcode Originator Operation Name Reference ------ ---------- -------------- --------- 0x00 Initiator NOP-Out [RFC3720] 0x01 Initiator SCSI Command [RFC3720] 0x02 Initiator SCSI Task Management [RFC3720] function request 0x03 Initiator Login Request [RFC3720] 0x04 Initiator Text Request [RFC3720] 0x05 Initiator SCSI Data-Out [RFC3720] 0x06 Initiator Logout Request [RFC3720] 0x10 Initiator SNACK Request [RFC3720] 0x1c-0x1e Initiator Vendor specific codes [RFC3720] 0x20 Target NOP-In [RFC3720] 0x21 Target SCSI Response [RFC3720] 0x22 Target SCSI Task Management [RFC3720] function response 0x23 Target Login Response [RFC3720] 0x24 Target Text Response [RFC3720] 0x25 Target SCSI Data-In [RFC3720] 0x26 Target Logout Response [RFC3720] 0x31 Target Ready To Transfer (R2T) [RFC3720] 0x32 Target Asynchronous Message [RFC3720] 0x3c-0x3e Target Vendor specific codes [RFC3720] 0x3f Target Reject [RFC3720] "Reserved to IANA" opcodes: 0x11, 0x12, 0x1f, 0x30 Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]), Expert Review ([IANA]) NOTE: Expert Assignment Required Action 2 (Section 11.3): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters create a new sub-registry "iSCSI Text Keys" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Key Reference ---------- --------- AuthMethod [RFC3720] HeaderDigest [RFC3720] DataDigest [RFC3720] MaxConnections [RFC3720] SendTargets [RFC3720] TargetName [RFC3720] InitiatorName [RFC3720] TargetAlias [RFC3720] InitiatorAlias [RFC3720] TargetAddress [RFC3720] TargetPortalGroupTag [RFC3720] InitialR2T [RFC3720] ImmediateData [RFC3720] MaxRecvDataSegmentLength [RFC3720] MaxBurstLength [RFC3720] FirstBurstLength [RFC3720] DefaultTime2Wait [RFC3720] DefaultTime2Retain [RFC3720] MaxOutstandingR2T [RFC3720] DataPDUInOrder [RFC3720] DataSequenceInOrder [RFC3720] ErrorRecoveryLevel [RFC3720] SessionType [RFC3720] RDMAExtensions [iSER] TargetRecvDataSegmentLength [iSER] InitiatorRecvDataSegmentLength [iSER] MaxOutstandingUnexpectedPDUs [iSER] TaskReporting [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) [ NOTE: Should this registry get alphabetized? ] Action 3 (Section 11.4): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters create a new sub-registry "iSCSI Asynchronous Events" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Event Number Description Reference (one octet) ------------ ----------------------- --------- 0 SCSI Async Event [RFC3720] 1 Logout Request [RFC3720] 2 Connection drop notification [RFC3720] 3 Session drop notification [RFC3720] 4 Negotiation Request [RFC3720] 5 Task termination [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] 6-247 Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] 248-254 Vendor-unique [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] 255 Vendor-unique [RFC3720] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 4 (Section 11.5): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters create a new sub-registry "iSCSI TMF Codes" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: TMF Code Description Reference (7 bits) -------- ----------- --------- 1 ABORT TASK [RFC3720] 2 ABORT TASK SET [RFC3720] 3 CLEAR ACA [RFC3720] 4 CLEAR TASK SET [RFC3720] 5 LOGICAL UNIT RESET [RFC3720] 6 TARGET WARM RESET [RFC3720] 7 TARGET COLD RESET [RFC3720] 8 TASK REASSIGN [RFC3720] 9-127 Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 5 (Section 11.6): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters create a new sub-registry "iSCSI Login Response Status Codes" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Status Class Description Reference (one octet) ----------- -------------------- --------- 0x00 Success [RFC3720] 0x01 Redirection [RFC3720] 0x02 Initiator Error [RFC3720] 0x03 Target Error [RFC3720] 0x04-0x0e Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] 0x0f Vendor-Unique [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] 0x10-0xff Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 6 (Section 11.6): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters in the sub-registry "iSCSI Login Response Status Codes" create a new sub-sub-registry "Status-Detail for Status-Class=0x00" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Status Class Status Code Description Reference (fixed) (one octet) ----------- ----------- -------------------- --------- 0x00 0x00 Success [RFC3720] 0x00 0x01-0xff Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 7 (Section 11.6): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters in the sub-registry "iSCSI Login Response Status Codes" create a new sub-sub-registry "Status-Detail for Status-Class=0x01" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Status Class Status Code Description Reference (fixed) (one octet) ----------- ----------- -------------------- --------- 0x01 0x01 Temporary move [RFC3720] 0x01 0x02 Permanent move [RFC3720] 0x01 0x03-0xff Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 8 (Section 11.6): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters in the sub-registry "iSCSI Login Response Status Codes" create a new sub-sub-registry "Status-Detail for Status-Class=0x02" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Status Class Status Code Description Reference (fixed) (one octet) ----------- ----------- -------------------- --------- 0x02 0x00 Miscellaneous [RFC3720] 0x02 0x01 Authentication failure [RFC3720] 0x02 0x02 Authorization failure [RFC3720] 0x02 0x03 Not found [RFC3720] 0x02 0x04 Target removed [RFC3720] 0x02 0x05 Unsupported version [RFC3720] 0x02 0x06 Too many connections [RFC3720] 0x02 0x07 Missing parameter [RFC3720] 0x02 0x08 Can't include in session [RFC3720] 0x02 0x09 Unsupported session type [RFC3720] 0x02 0x0a Non-existent session [RFC3720] 0x02 0x0b Invalid during login [RFC3720] 0x02 0x0c-0xff Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 9 (Section 11.6): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters in the sub-registry "iSCSI Login Response Status Codes" create a new sub-sub-registry "Status-Detail for Status-Class=0x03" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Status Class Status Code Description Reference (fixed) (one octet) ----------- ----------- -------------------- --------- 0x03 0x00 Target error [RFC3720] 0x03 0x01 Service unavailable [RFC3720] 0x03 0x02 Out of resources [RFC3720] 0x03 0x03-0xff Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 10 (Section 11.7): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters create a new sub-registry "iSCSI Reject Reason Codes" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Reason Code Description Reference (one octet) ----------- ------------------ --------- 0x01 Reserved [RFC3720] 0x02 Data digest error [RFC3720] 0x03 SNACK Reject [RFC3720] 0x04 Protocol Error [RFC3720] 0x05 Command not supported [RFC3720] 0x06 Immediate command reject [RFC3720] 0x07 Task in progress [RFC3720] 0x08 Invalid data ack [RFC3720] 0x09 Invalid PDU field [RFC3720] 0x0a Long op reject [RFC3720] 0x0b "Deprecated reason code" [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] 0x0c Waiting for Logout [RFC3720] 0x0d-oxff Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 11 (Section 11.8): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters create a new sub-registry "iSER Opcodes" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Opcode Operation Name Reference (4 bits) -------- ------------------- --------- 0x1 iSCSI control-type [iSER] 0x2 iSER Hello [iSER] 0x3 iSER HelloReply [iSER] 0x4-0xf Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) We understand the above to be the only IANA Actions for this document. [ Note: reference to iSER is from draft normative references in section 12.1, draft-ietf-ips-iser-04.txt ] |
2007-05-31
|
09 | Yoshiko Fong | Last Call Comments: Upon approval of this document, the IANA will take the following Actions: Action 1 (Section 11.2) Upon approval of this document, the … Last Call Comments: Upon approval of this document, the IANA will take the following Actions: Action 1 (Section 11.2) Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters create a new sub-registry "iSCSI Opcodes" Namespace details: Numerical values that can fit in one octet with most significant two bits (bits 0 and 1) already designated by [RFC3720], bit 0 being reserved and bit 1 for immediate delivery. Bit 2 is designated to identify the originator of the opcode. Bit 2 = 0 for initiator and Bit 2 = 1 for target Allocation request guidance to requesters: 1) If initiator opcode and target opcode to identify the request and response of a new type of protocol operation are requested, assign the same lower five bits (i.e. Bit 3 through Bit 7) for both opcodes, e.g. 0x13 and 0x33 2) If only the initiator opcode or target opcode is requested to identify a one-way protocol message (i.e. request without a response or a "response" without a request), assign an unused number from the appropriate category (i.e. Bit 2 set to 0 or 1 for initiator category or target category) and add the other pair member (i.e. same opcode with Bit 2 set to 1 or 0, respectively) to "Reserved to IANA" list. 3) If there are no other opcodes available to assign on a request for a new opcode except the reserved opcodes in the "Reserved to IANA" list, allocate the opcodes from the appropriate category (initiator or target). Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Opcode Originator Operation Name Reference ------ ---------- -------------- --------- 0x00 Initiator NOP-Out [RFC3720] 0x01 Initiator SCSI Command [RFC3720] 0x02 Initiator SCSI Task Management [RFC3720] function request 0x03 Initiator Login Request [RFC3720] 0x04 Initiator Text Request [RFC3720] 0x05 Initiator SCSI Data-Out [RFC3720] 0x06 Initiator Logout Request [RFC3720] 0x10 Initiator SNACK Request [RFC3720] 0x1c-0x1e Initiator Vendor specific codes [RFC3720] 0x20 Target NOP-In [RFC3720] 0x21 Target SCSI Response [RFC3720] 0x22 Target SCSI Task Management [RFC3720] function response 0x23 Target Login Response [RFC3720] 0x24 Target Text Response [RFC3720] 0x25 Target SCSI Data-In [RFC3720] 0x26 Target Logout Response [RFC3720] 0x31 Target Ready To Transfer (R2T) [RFC3720] 0x32 Target Asynchronous Message [RFC3720] 0x3c-0x3e Target Vendor specific codes [RFC3720] 0x3f Target Reject [RFC3720] "Reserved to IANA" opcodes: 0x11, 0x12, 0x1f, 0x30 Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]), Expert Review ([IANA]) NOTE: Expert Assignment Required Action 2 (Section 11.3): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters create a new sub-registry "iSCSI Text Keys" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Key Reference ---------- --------- AuthMethod [RFC3720] HeaderDigest [RFC3720] DataDigest [RFC3720] MaxConnections [RFC3720] SendTargets [RFC3720] TargetName [RFC3720] InitiatorName [RFC3720] TargetAlias [RFC3720] InitiatorAlias [RFC3720] TargetAddress [RFC3720] TargetPortalGroupTag [RFC3720] InitialR2T [RFC3720] ImmediateData [RFC3720] MaxRecvDataSegmentLength [RFC3720] MaxBurstLength [RFC3720] FirstBurstLength [RFC3720] DefaultTime2Wait [RFC3720] DefaultTime2Retain [RFC3720] MaxOutstandingR2T [RFC3720] DataPDUInOrder [RFC3720] DataSequenceInOrder [RFC3720] ErrorRecoveryLevel [RFC3720] SessionType [RFC3720] RDMAExtensions [iSER] TargetRecvDataSegmentLength [iSER] InitiatorRecvDataSegmentLength [iSER] MaxOutstandingUnexpectedPDUs [iSER] TaskReporting [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) [ NOTE: Should this registry get alphabetized? ] Action 3 (Section 11.4): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters create a new sub-registry "iSCSI Asynchronous Events" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Event Number Description Reference (one octet) ------------ ----------------------- --------- 0 SCSI Async Event [RFC3720] 1 Logout Request [RFC3720] 2 Connection drop notification [RFC3720] 3 Session drop notification [RFC3720] 4 Negotiation Request [RFC3720] 5 Task termination [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] 6-247 Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] 248-254 Vendor-unique [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] 255 Vendor-unique [RFC3720] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 4 (Section 11.5): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters create a new sub-registry "iSCSI TMF Codes" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: TMF Code Description Reference (7 bits) -------- ----------- --------- 1 ABORT TASK [RFC3720] 2 ABORT TASK SET [RFC3720] 3 CLEAR ACA [RFC3720] 4 CLEAR TASK SET [RFC3720] 5 LOGICAL UNIT RESET [RFC3720] 6 TARGET WARM RESET [RFC3720] 7 TARGET COLD RESET [RFC3720] 8 TASK REASSIGN [RFC3720] 9-127 Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 5 (Section 11.6): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters create a new sub-registry "iSCSI Login Response Status Codes" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Status Class Description Reference (one octet) ----------- -------------------- --------- 0x00 Success [RFC3720] 0x01 Redirection [RFC3720] 0x02 Initiator Error [RFC3720] 0x03 Target Error [RFC3720] 0x04-0x0e Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] 0x0f Vendor-Unique [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] 0x10-0xff Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 6 (Section 11.6): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters in the sub-registry "iSCSI Login Response Status Codes" create a new sub-sub-registry "Status-Detail for Status-Class=0x00" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Status Class Status Code Description Reference (fixed) (one octet) ----------- ----------- -------------------- --------- 0x00 0x00 Success [RFC3720] 0x00 0x01-0xff Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 7 (Section 11.6): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters in the sub-registry "iSCSI Login Response Status Codes" create a new sub-sub-registry "Status-Detail for Status-Class=0x01" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Status Class Status Code Description Reference (fixed) (one octet) ----------- ----------- -------------------- --------- 0x01 0x01 Temporary move [RFC3720] 0x01 0x02 Permanent move [RFC3720] 0x01 0x03-0xff Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 8 (Section 11.6): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters in the sub-registry "iSCSI Login Response Status Codes" create a new sub-sub-registry "Status-Detail for Status-Class=0x02" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Status Class Status Code Description Reference (fixed) (one octet) ----------- ----------- -------------------- --------- 0x02 0x00 Miscellaneous [RFC3720] 0x02 0x01 Authentication failure [RFC3720] 0x02 0x02 Authorization failure [RFC3720] 0x02 0x03 Not found [RFC3720] 0x02 0x04 Target removed [RFC3720] 0x02 0x05 Unsupported version [RFC3720] 0x02 0x06 Too many connections [RFC3720] 0x02 0x07 Missing parameter [RFC3720] 0x02 0x08 Can't include in session [RFC3720] 0x02 0x09 Unsupported session type [RFC3720] 0x02 0x0a Non-existent session [RFC3720] 0x02 0x0b Invalid during login [RFC3720] 0x02 0x0c-0xff Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 9 (Section 11.6): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters in the sub-registry "iSCSI Login Response Status Codes" create a new sub-sub-registry "Status-Detail for Status-Class=0x03" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Status Class Status Code Description Reference (fixed) (one octet) ----------- ----------- -------------------- --------- 0x03 0x00 Target error [RFC3720] 0x03 0x01 Service unavailable [RFC3720] 0x03 0x02 Out of resources [RFC3720] 0x03 0x03-0xff Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 10 (Section 11.7): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters create a new sub-registry "iSCSI Reject Reason Codes" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Reason Code Description Reference (one octet) ----------- ------------------ --------- 0x01 Reserved [RFC3720] 0x02 Data digest error [RFC3720] 0x03 SNACK Reject [RFC3720] 0x04 Protocol Error [RFC3720] 0x05 Command not supported [RFC3720] 0x06 Immediate command reject [RFC3720] 0x07 Task in progress [RFC3720] 0x08 Invalid data ack [RFC3720] 0x09 Invalid PDU field [RFC3720] 0x0a Long op reject [RFC3720] 0x0b "Deprecated reason code" [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] 0x0c Waiting for Logout [RFC3720] 0x0d-oxff Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) Action 11 (Section 11.8): Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "iSCSI Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/iscsi-parameters create a new sub-registry "iSER Opcodes" Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: Opcode Operation Name Reference (4 bits) -------- ------------------- --------- 0x1 iSCSI control-type [iSER] 0x2 iSER Hello [iSER] 0x3 iSER HelloReply [iSER] 0x4-0xf Reserved to IANA [RFC-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08] Allocation Policy: Standards Action ([IANA]) We understand the above to be the only IANA Actions for this document. [ Note: reference to iSER is from draft normative references in section 12.1, draft-ietf-ips-iser-04.txt ] |
2007-05-25
|
09 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tom Yu |
2007-05-25
|
09 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tom Yu |
2007-05-24
|
09 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2007-05-24
|
09 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2007-05-24
|
09 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Lars Eggert |
2007-05-24
|
09 | Lars Eggert | Ballot has been issued by Lars Eggert |
2007-05-24
|
09 | Lars Eggert | Created "Approve" ballot |
2007-05-24
|
09 | Lars Eggert | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-06-07 by Lars Eggert |
2007-05-24
|
09 | Lars Eggert | Tentatively on the agenda for June 6. |
2007-05-24
|
09 | Lars Eggert | Last Call was requested by Lars Eggert |
2007-05-24
|
09 | Lars Eggert | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Lars Eggert |
2007-05-24
|
09 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2007-05-24
|
09 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2007-05-24
|
09 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2007-05-22
|
09 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2007-05-22
|
08 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-08.txt |
2007-05-15
|
09 | Lars Eggert | State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Lars Eggert |
2007-05-15
|
09 | Lars Eggert | New revision forthcoming to address comments of early IANA review. |
2007-04-26
|
09 | Lars Eggert | State Changes to AD Evaluation from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Lars Eggert |
2007-04-26
|
09 | Lars Eggert | WG is evaluating the recent IANA considerations additions, AD has sent comments, IANA has been asked to do an early review of this section. |
2007-04-16
|
09 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2007-04-16
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-07.txt |
2007-02-27
|
09 | Lars Eggert | State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Lars Eggert |
2007-02-27
|
09 | Lars Eggert | Document must define and populate a IANA registries for various iSCSI parameters. |
2007-02-27
|
09 | Lars Eggert | [Note]: 'Document Shepherd: David Black' added by Lars Eggert |
2007-02-27
|
09 | Lars Eggert | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Lars Eggert |
2007-02-27
|
09 | Lars Eggert | State Change Notice email list have been change to ips-chairs@tools.ietf.org, cbm@rose.hp.com from ips-chairs@tools.ietf.org |
2007-02-26
|
09 | Dinara Suleymanova | PROTO Write-up (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? David L. Black (ips WG Chair) Has the Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version … PROTO Write-up (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? David L. Black (ips WG Chair) Has the Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the document and, in particular, does he or she believe this version is ready for forwarding to the IESG for publication? Yes, mostly. The Document Shepherd has been delayed in reviewing the document, and has a number of comments on the document. The Document Shepherd is comfortable having his review comments treated as initial IETF Last Call comments in order to not further delay publication of this draft, unless the IANA registry issue requires the draft to be revised prior to IETF Last Call - see (1.i) below. (1.b) Has the document had adequate review both from key WG members and from key non-WG members? Yes. Does the Document Shepherd have any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed? No. Portions of this document deal with iSCSI task management and iSCSI error handling, where there are a limited number of individuals with expertise sufficient to perform a thorough review. This document has received sufficient review from such individuals, including the document author and the principal author/editor of RFC 3720, the main iSCSI specification. (1.c) Does the Document Shepherd have concerns that the document needs more review from a particular or broader perspective, e.g., security, operational complexity, someone familiar with AAA, internationalization or XML? No. (1.d) Does the Document Shepherd have any specific concerns or issues with this document that the Responsible Area Director and/or the IESG should be aware of? For example, perhaps he or she is uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or has concerns whether there really is a need for it. In any event, if the WG has discussed those issues and has indicated that it still wishes to advance the document, detail those concerns here. No. Has an IPR disclosure related to this document been filed? If so, please include a reference to the disclosure and summarize the WG discussion and conclusion on this issue. No. (1.e) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and agree with it? The WG as a whole understands and agrees with this document. (1.f) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme discontent? If so, please summarise the areas of conflict in separate email messages to the Responsible Area Director. (It should be in a separate email because this questionnaire is entered into the ID Tracker.) No. (1.g) Has the Document Shepherd personally verified that the document satisfies all ID nits? (See http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html and http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/). Boilerplate checks are not enough; this check needs to be thorough. idnits 2.03.6 finds no problems. Has the document met all formal review criteria it needs to, such as the MIB Doctor, media type and URI type reviews? None are applicable. (1.h) Has the document split its references into normative and informative? Yes. Are there normative references to documents that are not ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear state? If such normative references exist, what is the strategy for their completion? No. Are there normative references that are downward references, as described in [RFC3967]? If so, list these downward references to support the Area Director in the Last Call procedure for them [RFC3967]. No, the possible downward reference found by idnits is to a published ANSI standard (T10 SPC-3 is ANSI INCITS 408-2005), and hence is not a concern. (1.i) Has the Document Shepherd verified that the document IANA consideration section exists and is consistent with the body of the document? Yes. If the document specifies protocol extensions, are reservations requested in appropriate IANA registries? Are the IANA registries clearly identified? No, as no such registries exist. The Responsible Area Director and/ or the IESG need to determine whether this draft warrants creation of a set of iSCSI registries based on RFC 3720 and this document. If the document creates a new registry, does it define the proposed initial contents of the registry and an allocation procedure for future registrations? Does it suggest a reasonable name for the new registry? See [RFC2434]. Not applicable. If the document describes an Expert Review process has Shepherd conferred with the Responsible Area Director so that the IESG can appoint the needed Expert during the IESG Evaluation? Not applicable. (1.j) Has the Document Shepherd verified that sections of the document that are written in a formal language, such as XML code, BNF rules, MIB definitions, etc., validate correctly in an automated checker? Not applicable. (1.k) The IESG approval announcement includes a Document Announcement Write-Up. Please provide such a Document Announcement Write-Up? Recent examples can be found in the "Action" announcements for approved documents. The approval announcement contains the following sections: Technical Summary iSCSI is a SCSI transport protocol that maps the SCSI architecture and command sets onto TCP/IP. RFC 3720 defines the iSCSI protocol. This document compiles the clarifications to the original protocol definition in RFC 3720 to serve as a companion document for the iSCSI implementers. This document updates RFC 3720 and the text in this document supersedes the text in RFC 3720 when the two differ. Working Group Summary This document consists of clarification items collected during a period of more than one year based on implementation experience. A number of the items have engendered significant working group discussion about the appropriate clarification or change. The ips WG strongly supports the resulting clarifications and changes in this document. Document Quality There are numerous implementations of iSCSI, and the entire content of this document is based on issues that have arisen from implementation experience. There are a large number of individuals listed in the acknowledgements section who have contributed to this document based on their expertise and/or implementation experience. David Black (ips WG chair) and Julian Satran (RFC 3720 editor) have reviewed this document for the ips WG. Personnel Document Shepherd: David Black (ips WG chair) Responsible Area Director: Lars Eggert (Transport Area) |
2007-02-26
|
09 | Dinara Suleymanova | State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Dinara Suleymanova |
2007-02-20
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-06.txt |
2007-02-07
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-05.txt |
2007-01-09
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-04.txt |
2006-09-16
|
09 | (System) | State Changes to AD is watching from Dead by system |
2006-09-15
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-03.txt |
2006-09-04
|
09 | (System) | State Changes to Dead from AD is watching by system |
2006-09-04
|
09 | (System) | Document has expired |
2006-03-20
|
09 | Lars Eggert | Shepherding AD has been changed to Lars Eggert from Allison Mankin |
2006-03-20
|
09 | Lars Eggert | Draft Added by Lars Eggert in state AD is watching |
2006-03-03
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-02.txt |
2005-09-20
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-01.txt |
2005-07-12
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-impl-guide-00.txt |