Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
(Spencer Dawkins) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Alia Atlas) No Objection
(Benoît Claise) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell) No Objection
Comment (2014-03-26 for -04)
No email
send info
send info
Having just struggled with setting up tc and netem for the first time in years this week, it'd be a fine service to humanity if you were able to make annotated setup scripts for your tests available, either as informative references via some stable URL or even in an appendix. I understand if you don't want to, but it'd be a nice thing.
(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection
(Barry Leiba) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection
Comment (2014-03-26 for -04)
No email
send info
send info
Just a nit: In Introduction, change From: The IETF (IP Performance Metrics working group, IPPM) To: The IETF IP Performance Metrics working group (IPPM)