%% You should probably cite rfc7290 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-01, number = {draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-01}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680/01/}, author = {Len Ciavattone and Ruediger Geib and Al Morton and Matthias Wieser}, title = {{Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track}}, pagetotal = 27, year = 2013, month = jan, day = 3, abstract = {This memo proposes to advance a performance metric RFC along the standards track, specifically RFC 2680 on One-way Loss Metrics. Observing that the metric definitions themselves should be the primary focus rather than the implementations of metrics, this memo describes the test procedures to evaluate specific metric requirement clauses to determine if the requirement has been interpreted and implemented as intended. Two completely independent implementations have been tested against the key specifications of RFC 2680. In this version, the results are presented in the R-tool output form. Beautification is future work.}, }