Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) Data Model
draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-yang-00
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Greg Mirsky , Xiao Min , Wei S Luo | ||
| Last updated | 2018-01-05 | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-yang-00
Network Working Group G. Mirsky
Internet-Draft X. Min
Intended status: Standards Track ZTE Corp.
Expires: July 9, 2018 W. Luo
Ericsson
January 5, 2018
Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) Data Model
draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-yang-00
Abstract
This document specifies the data model for implementations of Sender
and Reflector for Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP)
mode using YANG.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 9, 2018.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Scope, Model, and Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Data Model Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1.1. STAMP-Sender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1.2. STAMP-Reflector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
6. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Appendix A. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
1. Introduction
The Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP)
[I-D.ietf-ippm-stamp] can be used to measure performance parameters
of IP networks such as latency, jitter, and packet loss by sending
test packets and monitoring their experience in the network. The
STAMP protocol [Editor:ref to STAMP draft] in unauthenticated mode is
on-wire compatible with STAMP Light, mdiscussed in Appendix I
[RFC5357]. The STAMP Light is known to have many implementations
though no common management framework being defined, thus leaving
some aspects of test packet processing to interpretation. As one of
goals of STAMP is to support these variations, this document presents
their analysis; describes common STAMP and STAMP model while allowing
for STAMP extensions in the future. This document defines the STAMP
data model and specifies it formally using the YANG data modeling
language [RFC6020].
1.1. Conventions used in this document
1.1.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
2. Scope, Model, and Applicability
The scope of this document includes model of the STAMP as defined in
[Editor:ref to STAMP draft].
o----------------------------------------------------------o
| Config client |
o----------------------------------------------------------o
|| ||
|| NETCONF/RESTCONF ||
|| ||
o-------------------o o-------------------o
| Config server | | Config server |
| | | |
+-------------------+ +-------------------+
| STAMP Sender | <--- STAMP---> | STAMP Reflector |
+-------------------+ +-------------------+
Figure 1: STAMP Reference Model
2.1. Data Model Parameters
This section describes all the parameters of the the stamp data
model.
2.1.1. STAMP-Sender
The stamp-session-sender container holds items that are related to
the configuration of the stamp Session-Sender logical entity.
The stamp-session-sender-state container holds information about the
state of the particular STAMP test session.
RPCs stamp-sender-start and stamp-sender-stop respectively start and
stop the referenced by session-id STAMP test session.
2.1.1.1. Controls for Test Session and Preforrmance Metric Calculation
The data model supports several scenarios for a STAMP Sender to
execute test sessions and calculate performance metrics:
The test mode in which the test packets are sent unbound in time
at defined by the parameter 'interval' in the stamp-session-sender
container frequency is referred as continuous mode. Performance
metrics in the continuous mode are calculated at period defined by
the parameter 'measurement-interval'.
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
The test mode that has specific number of the test packets
configured for the test session in the 'number-of-packets'
parameter is referred as periodic mode. The test session may be
repeated by the STAMP-Sender with the same parameters. The
'repeat' parameter defines number of tests and the 'repeat-
interval' - the interval between the consecuitive tests. The
performance metrics are calculated after each test session when
the interval defined by the 'session-timeout' expires.
2.1.2. STAMP-Reflector
The stamp-session-reflector container holds items that are related to
the configuration of the STAMP Session-Reflector logical entity.
The stamp-session-refl-state container holds Session-Reflector state
data for the particular STAMP test session.
3. Data Model
Creating STAMP data model presents number of challenges and among
them is identification of a test-session at Session-Reflector. A
Session-Reflector MAY require only as little as its IP and UDP port
number in received STAMP-Test packet to spawn new test session. More
so, to test processing of Class-of-Service along the same route in
Equal Cost Multi-Path environment Session-Sender may run STAMP test
sessions concurrently using the same source IP address, source UDP
port number, destination IP address, and destination UDP port number.
Thus the only parameter that can be used to differentiate these test
sessions would be DSCP value. The DSCP field may get re-marked along
the path and without use of [RFC7750] that will go undetected, but by
using five-tuple instead of four-tuple as a key we can ensure that
STAMP test packets that are considered as different test sessions
follow the same path even in ECMP environments.
3.1. Tree Diagram
module: ietf-stamp
+--rw stamp
| +--rw stamp-session-sender {session-sender}?
| | +--rw sender-enable? enable
| | +--rw test-session* [session-id]
| | +--rw session-id uint32
| | +--rw test-session-enable? enable
| | +--rw number-of-packets? union
| | +--rw packet-padding-size? uint32
| | +--rw interval? uint32
| | +--rw session-timeout? uint32
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
| | +--rw measurement-interval? uint32
| | +--rw repeat? union
| | +--rw repeat-interval? uint32
| | +--rw dscp-value? inet:dscp
| | +--rw test-session-reflector-mode? session-reflector-mode
| | +--rw sender-ip inet:ip-address
| | +--rw sender-udp-port inet:port-number
| | +--rw reflector-ip inet:ip-address
| | +--rw reflector-udp-port? inet:port-number
| | +--rw authentication-params! {stamp-authentication}?
| | | +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref
| | +--rw first-percentile? percentile
| | +--rw second-percentile? percentile
| | +--rw third-percentile? percentile
| +--rw stamp-session-reflector {session-reflector}?
| +--rw reflector-enable? enable
| +--rw ref-wait? uint32
| +--rw reflector-mode-state? session-reflector-mode
| +--rw test-session* [session-id]
| +--rw session-id uint32
| +--rw dscp-handling-mode? session-dscp-mode
| +--rw dscp-value? inet:dscp
| +--rw sender-ip inet:ip-address
| +--rw sender-udp-port inet:port-number
| +--rw reflector-ip inet:ip-address
| +--rw reflector-udp-port? inet:port-number
| +--rw authentication-params! {stamp-authentication}?
| +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref
+--ro stamp-state
+--ro stamp-session-sender-state {session-sender}?
| +--ro test-session-state* [session-id]
| +--ro session-id uint32
| +--ro sender-session-state? enumeration
| +--ro current-stats
| | +--ro start-time yang:date-and-time
| | +--ro packet-padding-size? uint32
| | +--ro interval? uint32
| | +--ro duplicate-packets? uint32
| | +--ro reordered-packets? uint32
| | +--ro sender-ip inet:ip-address
| | +--ro sender-udp-port inet:port-number
| | +--ro reflector-ip inet:ip-address
| | +--ro reflector-udp-port? inet:port-number
| | +--ro dscp? inet:dscp
| | +--ro sent-packets? uint32
| | +--ro rcv-packets? uint32
| | +--ro sent-packets-error? uint32
| | +--ro rcv-packets-error? uint32
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
| | +--ro last-sent-seq? uint32
| | +--ro last-rcv-seq? uint32
| | +--ro two-way-delay
| | | +--ro delay
| | | | +--ro min? yang:gauge32
| | | | +--ro max? yang:gauge32
| | | | +--ro avg? yang:gauge32
| | | +--ro delay-variation
| | | +--ro min? uint32
| | | +--ro max? uint32
| | | +--ro avg? uint32
| | +--ro one-way-delay-far-end
| | | +--ro delay
| | | | +--ro min? yang:gauge32
| | | | +--ro max? yang:gauge32
| | | | +--ro avg? yang:gauge32
| | | +--ro delay-variation
| | | +--ro min? uint32
| | | +--ro max? uint32
| | | +--ro avg? uint32
| | +--ro one-way-delay-near-end
| | | +--ro delay
| | | | +--ro min? yang:gauge32
| | | | +--ro max? yang:gauge32
| | | | +--ro avg? yang:gauge32
| | | +--ro delay-variation
| | | +--ro min? uint32
| | | +--ro max? uint32
| | | +--ro avg? uint32
| | +--ro low-percentile
| | | +--ro delay-percentile
| | | | +--ro rtt-delay? percentile
| | | | +--ro near-end-delay? percentile
| | | | +--ro far-end-delay? percentile
| | | +--ro delay-variation-percentile
| | | +--ro rtt-delay-variation? percentile
| | | +--ro near-end-delay-variation? percentile
| | | +--ro far-end-delay-variation? percentile
| | +--ro mid-percentile
| | | +--ro delay-percentile
| | | | +--ro rtt-delay? percentile
| | | | +--ro near-end-delay? percentile
| | | | +--ro far-end-delay? percentile
| | | +--ro delay-variation-percentile
| | | +--ro rtt-delay-variation? percentile
| | | +--ro near-end-delay-variation? percentile
| | | +--ro far-end-delay-variation? percentile
| | +--ro high-percentile
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
| | | +--ro delay-percentile
| | | | +--ro rtt-delay? percentile
| | | | +--ro near-end-delay? percentile
| | | | +--ro far-end-delay? percentile
| | | +--ro delay-variation-percentile
| | | +--ro rtt-delay-variation? percentile
| | | +--ro near-end-delay-variation? percentile
| | | +--ro far-end-delay-variation? percentile
| | +--ro two-way-loss
| | | +--ro loss-count? int32
| | | +--ro loss-ratio? percentage
| | | +--ro loss-burst-max? int32
| | | +--ro loss-burst-min? int32
| | | +--ro loss-burst-count? int32
| | +--ro one-way-loss-far-end
| | | +--ro loss-count? int32
| | | +--ro loss-ratio? percentage
| | | +--ro loss-burst-max? int32
| | | +--ro loss-burst-min? int32
| | | +--ro loss-burst-count? int32
| | +--ro one-way-loss-near-end
| | +--ro loss-count? int32
| | +--ro loss-ratio? percentage
| | +--ro loss-burst-max? int32
| | +--ro loss-burst-min? int32
| | +--ro loss-burst-count? int32
| +--ro history-stats* [id]
| +--ro id uint32
| +--ro end-time yang:date-and-time
| +--ro number-of-packets? uint32
| +--ro packet-padding-size? uint32
| +--ro interval? uint32
| +--ro duplicate-packets? uint32
| +--ro reordered-packets? uint32
| +--ro loss-packets? uint32
| +--ro sender-ip inet:ip-address
| +--ro sender-udp-port inet:port-number
| +--ro reflector-ip inet:ip-address
| +--ro reflector-udp-port? inet:port-number
| +--ro dscp? inet:dscp
| +--ro sent-packets? uint32
| +--ro rcv-packets? uint32
| +--ro sent-packets-error? uint32
| +--ro rcv-packets-error? uint32
| +--ro last-sent-seq? uint32
| +--ro last-rcv-seq? uint32
| +--ro two-way-delay
| | +--ro delay
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
| | | +--ro min? yang:gauge32
| | | +--ro max? yang:gauge32
| | | +--ro avg? yang:gauge32
| | +--ro delay-variation
| | +--ro min? uint32
| | +--ro max? uint32
| | +--ro avg? uint32
| +--ro one-way-delay-far-end
| | +--ro delay
| | | +--ro min? yang:gauge32
| | | +--ro max? yang:gauge32
| | | +--ro avg? yang:gauge32
| | +--ro delay-variation
| | +--ro min? uint32
| | +--ro max? uint32
| | +--ro avg? uint32
| +--ro one-way-delay-near-end
| +--ro delay
| | +--ro min? yang:gauge32
| | +--ro max? yang:gauge32
| | +--ro avg? yang:gauge32
| +--ro delay-variation
| +--ro min? uint32
| +--ro max? uint32
| +--ro avg? uint32
+--ro stamp-session-refl-state {session-reflector}?
+--ro reflector-light-admin-status boolean
+--ro test-session-state* [session-id]
+--ro session-id uint32
+--ro sent-packets? uint32
+--ro rcv-packets? uint32
+--ro sent-packets-error? uint32
+--ro rcv-packets-error? uint32
+--ro last-sent-seq? uint32
+--ro last-rcv-seq? uint32
+--ro sender-ip inet:ip-address
+--ro sender-udp-port inet:port-number
+--ro reflector-ip inet:ip-address
+--ro reflector-udp-port? inet:port-number
rpcs:
+---x stamp-sender-start
| +---w input
| +---w session-id uint32
+---x stamp-sender-stop
+---w input
+---w session-id uint32
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
3.2. YANG Module
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-stamp@2018-01-05.yang"
module ietf-stamp {
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-stamp";
//namespace need to be assigned by IANA
prefix "ietf-stamp";
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix inet;
}
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix yang;
}
import ietf-key-chain {
prefix kc;
}
organization
"IETF IPPM (IP Performance Metrics) Working Group";
contact
"draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-yang@tools.ietf.org";
description "STAMP Data Model";
revision "2018-01-05" {
description
"00 version. Base STAMP specification is covered";
reference "";
}
feature session-sender {
description
"This feature relates to the device functions as the
STAMP Session-Sender";
}
feature session-reflector {
description
"This feature relates to the device functions as the
STAMP Session-Reflector";
}
feature stamp-authentication {
description
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
"STAMP authentication supported";
}
typedef enable {
type boolean;
description "enable";
}
typedef session-reflector-mode {
type enumeration {
enum stateful {
description
"When the Session-Reflector is stateful,
i.e. is aware of STAMP-Test session state.";
}
enum stateless {
description
"When the Session-Reflector is stateless,
i.e. is not aware of the state of
STAMP-Test session.";
}
}
description "State of the Session-Reflector";
}
typedef session-dscp-mode {
type enumeration {
enum copy-received-value {
description
"Use DSCP value copied from received
STAMP test packet of the test session.";
}
enum use-configured-value {
description
"Use DSCP value configured for this
test session on the Session-Reflector.";
}
}
description
"DSCP handling mode by Session-Reflector.";
}
typedef percentage {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 5;
}
description "Percentage";
}
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
typedef percentile {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 2;
}
description
"Percentile is a measure used in statistics
indicating the value below which a given
percentage of observations in a group of
observations fall.";
}
grouping maintenance-statistics {
description "Maintenance statistics grouping";
leaf sent-packets {
type uint32;
description "Packets sent";
}
leaf rcv-packets {
type uint32;
description "Packets received";
}
leaf sent-packets-error {
type uint32;
description "Packets sent error";
}
leaf rcv-packets-error {
type uint32;
description "Packets received error";
}
leaf last-sent-seq {
type uint32;
description "Last sent sequence number";
}
leaf last-rcv-seq {
type uint32;
description "Last received sequence number";
}
}
grouping stamp-session-percentile {
description "Percentile grouping";
leaf first-percentile {
type percentile;
default 95.00;
description
"First percentile to report";
}
leaf second-percentile {
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
type percentile;
default 99.00;
description
"Second percentile to report";
}
leaf third-percentile {
type percentile;
default 99.90;
description
"Third percentile to report";
}
}
grouping delay-statistics {
description "Delay statistics grouping";
container delay {
description "Packets transmitted delay";
leaf min {
type yang:gauge32;
units microseconds;
description
"Min of Packets transmitted delay";
}
leaf max {
type yang:gauge32;
units microseconds;
description
"Max of Packets transmitted delay";
}
leaf avg {
type yang:gauge32;
units microseconds;
description
"Avg of Packets transmitted delay";
}
}
container delay-variation {
description
"Packets transmitted delay variation";
leaf min {
type uint32;
units microseconds;
description
"Min of Packets transmitted
delay variation";
}
leaf max {
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
type uint32;
units microseconds;
description
"Max of Packets transmitted
delay variation";
}
leaf avg {
type uint32;
units microseconds;
description
"Avg of Packets transmitted
delay variation";
}
}
}
grouping time-percentile-report {
description "Delay percentile report grouping";
container delay-percentile {
description
"Report round-trip, near- and far-end delay";
leaf rtt-delay {
type percentile;
description
"Percentile of round-trip delay";
}
leaf near-end-delay {
type percentile;
description
"Percentile of near-end delay";
}
leaf far-end-delay {
type percentile;
description
"Percentile of far-end delay";
}
}
container delay-variation-percentile {
description
"Report round-trip, near- and far-end delay variation";
leaf rtt-delay-variation {
type percentile;
description
"Percentile of round-trip delay-variation";
}
leaf near-end-delay-variation {
type percentile;
description
"Percentile of near-end delay variation";
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
}
leaf far-end-delay-variation {
type percentile;
description
"Percentile of far-end delay-variation";
}
}
}
grouping packet-loss-statistics {
description
"Grouping for Packet Loss statistics";
leaf loss-count {
type int32;
description
"Number of lost packets
during the test interval.";
}
leaf loss-ratio {
type percentage;
description
"Ratio of packets lost to packets
sent during the test interval.";
}
leaf loss-burst-max {
type int32;
description
"Maximum number of consequtively
lost packets during the test interval.";
}
leaf loss-burst-min {
type int32;
description
"Minimum number of consequtively
lost packets during the test interval.";
}
leaf loss-burst-count {
type int32;
description
"Number of occasions with packet
loss during the test interval.";
}
}
grouping session-parameters {
description
"Parameters common among
Session-Sender and Session-Reflector";
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
leaf sender-ip {
type inet:ip-address;
mandatory true;
description "Sender IP address";
}
leaf sender-udp-port {
type inet:port-number {
range "49152..65535";
}
mandatory true;
description "Sender UDP port number";
}
leaf reflector-ip {
type inet:ip-address;
mandatory true;
description "Reflector IP address";
}
leaf reflector-udp-port {
type inet:port-number{
range "862 | 49152..65535";
}
default 862;
description "Reflector UDP port number";
}
}
grouping session-auth-params {
description
"Grouping for STAMP authentication parameters";
container authentication-params {
if-feature stamp-authentication;
presence "Enables STAMP authentication";
description
"Parameters for STAMP Light authentication";
leaf key-chain {
type kc:key-chain-ref;
description "Name of key-chain";
}
}
}
/* Configuration Data */
container stamp {
description
"Top level container for stamp configuration";
container stamp-session-sender {
if-feature session-sender;
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
description "stamp Session-Sender container";
leaf sender-enable {
type enable;
default "true";
description
"Whether this network element is enabled to
act as STAMP Sender";
}
list test-session {
key "session-id";
unique "sender-ip sender-udp-port reflector-ip"
+" reflector-udp-port dscp-value";
description
"This structure is a container of test session
managed objects";
leaf session-id {
type uint32;
description "Session ID";
}
leaf test-session-enable {
type enable;
default "true";
description
"Whether this STAMP Test session is enabled";
}
leaf number-of-packets {
type union {
type uint32 {
range 1..4294967294 {
description
"The overall number of UDP test packet
to be transmitted by the sender for this
test session";
}
}
type enumeration {
enum forever {
description
"Indicates that the test session SHALL
be run *forever*.";
}
}
}
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
default 10;
description
"This value determines if the STAMP-Test session is
bound by number of test packets or not.";
}
leaf packet-padding-size {
type uint32;
default 27;
description
"Size of the Packet Padding. Suggested to run
Path MTU Discovery to avoid packet fragmentation in
IPv4 and packet blackholing in IPv6";
}
leaf interval {
type uint32;
units microseconds;
description
"Time interval between transmission of two
consecutive packets in the test session in
microseconds";
}
leaf session-timeout {
when "../number-of-packets != 'forever'" {
description
"Test session timeout only valid if the
test mode is periodic.";
}
type uint32;
units "seconds";
default 900;
description
"The timeout value for the Session-Sender to
collect outstanding reflected packets.";
}
leaf measurement-interval {
when "../number-of-packets = 'forever'" {
description
"Valid only when the test to run forever,
i.e. continuously.";
}
type uint32;
units "seconds";
default 60;
description
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
"Interval to calculate performance metric when
the test mode is 'continuous'.";
}
leaf repeat {
type union {
type uint32 {
range 0..4294967294;
}
type enumeration {
enum forever {
description
"Indicates that the test session SHALL
be repeated *forever* using the
information in repeat-interval
parameter, and SHALL NOT decrement
the value.";
}
}
}
default 0;
description
"This value determines if the STAMP-Test session must
be repeated. When a test session has completed, the
repeat parameter is checked. The default value
of 0 indicates that the session MUST NOT be repeated.
If the repeat value is 1 through 4,294,967,294
then the test session SHALL be repeated using the
information in repeat-interval parameter.
The implementation MUST decrement the value of repeat
after determining a repeated session is expected.";
}
leaf repeat-interval {
when "../repeat != '0'";
type uint32;
units seconds;
default 0;
description
"This parameter determines the timing of repeated
STAMP-Test sessions when repeat is more than 0.";
}
leaf dscp-value {
type inet:dscp;
default 0;
description
"DSCP value to be set in the test packet.";
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
}
leaf test-session-reflector-mode {
type session-reflector-mode;
default "stateless";
description
"The mode of STAMP-Reflector for the test session.";
}
uses session-parameters;
uses session-auth-params;
uses stamp-session-percentile;
}
}
container stamp-session-reflector {
if-feature session-reflector;
description
"stamp Session-Reflector container";
leaf reflector-enable {
type enable;
default "true";
description
"Whether this network element is enabled to
act as stamp Reflector";
}
leaf ref-wait {
type uint32 {
range 1..604800;
}
units seconds;
default 900;
description
"REFWAIT(STAMP test session timeout in seconds),
the default value is 900";
}
leaf reflector-mode-state {
type session-reflector-mode;
default stateless;
description
"The state of the mode of the stamp
Session-Reflector";
}
list test-session {
key "session-id";
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
unique "sender-ip sender-udp-port reflector-ip"
+" reflector-udp-port";
description
"This structure is a container of test session
managed objects";
leaf session-id {
type uint32;
description "Session ID";
}
leaf dscp-handling-mode {
type session-dscp-mode;
default copy-received-value;
description
"Session-Reflector handling of DSCP:
- use value copied from received STAMP-Test packet;
- use value explicitly configured";
}
leaf dscp-value {
when "../dscp-handling-mode = 'use-configured-value'";
type inet:dscp;
default 0;
description
"DSCP value to be set in the reflected packet
if dscp-handling-mode is set to use-configured-value.";
}
uses session-parameters;
uses session-auth-params;
}
}
}
/* Operational state data nodes */
container stamp-state{
config "false";
description
"Top level container for stamp state data";
container stamp-session-sender-state {
if-feature session-sender;
description
"Session-Sender container for state data";
list test-session-state{
key "session-id";
description
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
"This structure is a container of test session
managed objects";
leaf session-id {
type uint32;
description "Session ID";
}
leaf sender-session-state {
type enumeration {
enum active {
description "Test session is active";
}
enum ready {
description "Test session is idle";
}
}
description
"State of the particular stamp test
session at the sender";
}
container current-stats {
description
"This container contains the results for the current
Measurement Interval in a Measurement session ";
leaf start-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
mandatory true;
description
"The time that the current Measurement Interval started";
}
leaf packet-padding-size {
type uint32;
default 27;
description
"Size of the Packet Padding. Suggested to run
Path MTU Discovery to avoid packet fragmentation
in IPv4 and packet backholing in IPv6";
}
leaf interval {
type uint32;
units microseconds;
description
"Time interval between transmission of two
consecutive packets in the test session";
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
}
leaf duplicate-packets {
type uint32;
description "Duplicate packets";
}
leaf reordered-packets {
type uint32;
description "Reordered packets";
}
uses session-parameters;
leaf dscp {
type inet:dscp;
description
"The DSCP value that was placed in the header of
STAMP UDP test packets by the Session-Sender.";
}
uses maintenance-statistics;
container two-way-delay {
description
"two way delay result of the test session";
uses delay-statistics;
}
container one-way-delay-far-end {
description
"one way delay far-end of the test session";
uses delay-statistics;
}
container one-way-delay-near-end {
description
"one way delay near-end of the test session";
uses delay-statistics;
}
container low-percentile {
when "/stamp/stamp-session-sender/"
+"test-session[session-id]/"
+"first-percentile != '0.00'" {
description
"Only valid if the
the first-percentile is not NULL";
}
description
"Low percentile report";
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
uses time-percentile-report;
}
container mid-percentile {
when "/stamp/stamp-session-sender/"
+"test-session[session-id]/"
+"second-percentile != '0.00'" {
description
"Only valid if the
the first-percentile is not NULL";
}
description
"Mid percentile report";
uses time-percentile-report;
}
container high-percentile {
when "/stamp/stamp-session-sender/"
+"test-session[session-id]/"
+"third-percentile != '0.00'" {
description
"Only valid if the
the first-percentile is not NULL";
}
description
"High percentile report";
uses time-percentile-report;
}
container two-way-loss {
description
"two way loss count and ratio result of
the test session";
uses packet-loss-statistics;
}
container one-way-loss-far-end {
when "/stamp/stamp-session-sender/"
+"test-session[session-id]/"
+"test-session-reflector-mode = 'stateful'" {
description
"One-way statistic is only valid if the
session-reflector is in stateful mode.";
}
description
"one way loss count and ratio far-end of
the test session";
uses packet-loss-statistics;
}
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
container one-way-loss-near-end {
when "/stamp/stamp-session-sender/"
+"test-session[session-id]/"
+"test-session-reflector-mode = 'stateful'" {
description
"One-way statistic is only valid if the
session-reflector is in stateful mode.";
}
description
"one way loss count and ratio near-end of
the test session";
uses packet-loss-statistics;
}
}
list history-stats {
key id;
description
"This container contains the results for the history
Measurement Interval in a Measurement session ";
leaf id {
type uint32;
description
"The identifier for the Measurement Interval
within this session";
}
leaf end-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
mandatory true;
description
"The time that the Measurement Interval ended";
}
leaf number-of-packets {
type uint32;
description
"The overall number of UDP test packets to be
transmitted by the sender for this test session";
}
leaf packet-padding-size {
type uint32;
default 27;
description
"Size of the Packet Padding. Suggested to run
Path MTU Discovery to avoid packet fragmentation
in IPv4 and packet blackholing in IPv6";
}
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
leaf interval {
type uint32;
units microseconds;
description
"Time interval between transmission of two
consecutive packets in the test session";
}
leaf duplicate-packets {
type uint32;
description "Duplicate packets";
}
leaf reordered-packets {
type uint32;
description "Reordered packets";
}
leaf loss-packets {
type uint32;
description "Loss packets";
}
uses session-parameters;
leaf dscp {
type inet:dscp;
description
"The DSCP value that was placed in the header of
STAMP UDP test packets by the Session-Sender.";
}
uses maintenance-statistics;
container two-way-delay{
description
"two way delay result of the test session";
uses delay-statistics;
}
container one-way-delay-far-end{
description
"one way delay far end of the test session";
uses delay-statistics;
}
container one-way-delay-near-end{
description
"one way delay near end of the test session";
uses delay-statistics;
}
}
}
}
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
container stamp-session-refl-state {
if-feature session-reflector;
description
"stamp Session-Reflector container for
state data";
leaf reflector-light-admin-status {
type boolean;
mandatory "true";
description
"Whether this network element is enabled to
act as stamp Reflector";
}
list test-session-state {
key "session-id";
description
"This structure is a container of test session
managed objects";
leaf session-id {
type uint32;
description "Session ID";
}
uses maintenance-statistics;
uses session-parameters;
}
}
}
rpc stamp-sender-start {
description
"start the configured sender session";
input {
leaf session-id {
type uint32;
mandatory true;
description
"The session to be started";
}
}
}
rpc stamp-sender-stop {
description
"stop the configured sender session";
input {
leaf session-id {
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
type uint32;
mandatory true;
description
"The session to be stopped";
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
4. IANA Considerations
This document registers a URI in the IETF XML registry [RFC3688].
Following the format in [RFC3688], the following registration is
requested to be made.
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-stamp
Registrant Contact: The IPPM WG of the IETF.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
This document registers a YANG module in the YANG Module Names
registry [RFC6020].
name: ietf-stamp
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-stamp
prefix: stamp
reference: RFC XXXX
5. Security Considerations
The configuration, state, action data defined in this document may be
accessed via the NETCONF protocol [RFC6241]. SSH [RFC6242] is
mandatory secure transport that is the lowest NETCONF layer. The
NETCONF access control model [RFC6536] provides means to restrict
access for particular NETCONF users to a pre-configured subset of all
available NETCONF protocol operations and content.
6. Normative References
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
[I-D.ietf-ippm-stamp]
Mirsky, G., Jun, G., and H. Nydell, "Simple Two-way Active
Measurement Protocol", draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-00 (work in
progress), January 2018.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC5357] Hedayat, K., Krzanowski, R., Morton, A., Yum, K., and J.
Babiarz, "A Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)",
RFC 5357, DOI 10.17487/RFC5357, October 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5357>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC6536] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model", RFC 6536,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6536, March 2012,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6536>.
[RFC7750] Hedin, J., Mirsky, G., and S. Baillargeon, "Differentiated
Service Code Point and Explicit Congestion Notification
Monitoring in the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol
(TWAMP)", RFC 7750, DOI 10.17487/RFC7750, February 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7750>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model January 2018
Appendix A. Acknowledgements
Authors recognize and appreciate valuable comments providen by Adrian
Pan.
Authors' Addresses
Greg Mirsky
ZTE Corp.
Email: gregimirsky@gmail.com
Xiao Min
ZTE Corp.
Email: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
Wei S Luo
Ericsson
Email: wei.s.luo@ericsson.com
Mirsky, et al. Expires July 9, 2018 [Page 29]