%% You should probably cite rfc8889 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-09, number = {draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-09}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark/09/}, author = {Giuseppe Fioccola and Mauro Cociglio and Amedeo Sapio and Riccardo Sisto}, title = {{Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring}}, pagetotal = 23, year = 2020, month = mar, day = 23, abstract = {The Alternate-Marking method, as presented in RFC 8321, can only be applied to point-to-point flows, because it assumes that all the packets of the flow measured on one node are measured again by a single second node. This document generalizes and expands this methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can follow several different paths in the network -- in wider terms, a multipoint-to-multipoint network. For this reason, the technique here described is called "Multipoint Alternate Marking".}, }